The challenge of teaching and learning in an academic social network. A case study at the University of Santiago de Compostela

  1. Adriana Gewerc Barujel 1
  2. Ana Rodríguez Groba 1
  3. María Lourdes Montero Mesa 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España



ISSN: 1989-9572

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 7

Issue: 2

Pages: 38-50

Type: Article

More publications in: JETT


Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2016
  • Journal Impact: 0.090
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 144/233


  • Social Sciences: C


Here we present the experience of the Stellae research group (University of Santiago de Compostela) in the use of academic social networks as a means for teaching and learning in Higher Education. It is an experience using student e-portfolios as artefacts spanning the breadth of teaching, learning and assessment processes. The teaching approach respects student diversity, promotes autonomy, proposes an elimination of barriers between formal and informal learning spaces and aims to encourage self and socio-regulated learning. The study aims to analyse the social network conditions that stimulate the development of these processes and how to use data generated in this context to improve proposals. We worked from a qualitative perspective combined with learning analytics quantitative techniques. The results show improved teacher access to data regarding student learning processes, and better knowledge of student network behaviour and motivation data. We conclude that the use of social networks creates a participation structure among students that provides great opportunities, fosters self and socio-regulation skills and promotes a positive correlation between the number of interactions and marks obtained.

Bibliographic References

  • Agra, M.J. Gewerc, A. & Montero, L. (2003). El portafolios como herramienta de análisis en experiencias de formación on-line y presenciales. Enseñanza & Teaching. Revista interuniversitaria de Didáctica, 21, 101-114.
  • Aguaded, J. I & Fonseca, Mª C. (Coords.) (2009). Huellas de innovación docente en las aulas universitarias. La Coruña (España): Netbiblo.
  • Barnett, R. (2002). Claves para entender la universidad en una era de supercomplejidad. Madrid: Pomares.
  • Bustos, A. & Coll, C. (2010). Los entornos virtuales como espacios de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 44(15),163-184.
  • Casquero, O. (2013). PLE: una perspectiva tecnológica. In L. Castañeda & J. Adell (Eds.). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. (pp. 71-84). Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Castañeda, L. & Adell, A. (2013). (Eds.). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B. & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309-329.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and selfregulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Back to the future: tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. In M. J.W. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching, 1-20.
  • De Jorge Moreno, J. (2012) Using social network and dropbox in blended learning: An application to University Education. Business, Management and Education,10 (2), 220231.
  • Dussel, I. (2011) Tic y Educación: Experiencias y aplicaciones en el aula. Documento Básico. Santillana: Foro Latinoamericano de Educación VII. Avaliable in:
  • Entwistle, N. & McCune, V. (2013). The disposition to understand for oneself at university: Integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 83 (2), 267-279.
  • Fiona, A., Järvela, S. & Miller, M. (2011). Self-Regulated, Co-regulated and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning. En A. Fiona, S. Järvela & M. Miller (eds.), Handbook of SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance, (pp. 65-87).New York: Routledge.
  • Fraga, F. & Gewerc, A. (2009). E-portafolios. La búsqueda de un software coherente con la propuesta de enseñanza. Red U Revista de Docencia Universitaria. Número monográfico III. Portafolios electrónicos y educación superior en España (en coedición con RED) Avaliable in: (
  • Gewerc, A. (2009). La bitácora y el viaje: El portafolios como herramienta de aprendizaje y evaluación. En M. J. Martínez Segura (Coord.). El portafolios para el aprendizaje y la evaluación (pp 103-129). Murcia: Editum.
  • Gewerc, A. & Rodríguez-Groba, A. (2014). La dimensión social en el aprendizaje autorregulado. Redes sociales como medio para la enseñanza. In VV.AA. TICs para el aprendizaje de la ingeniería. IEEE TICAI. Sociedad de Educación. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo.
  • Gewerc, A., Montero, L. & Lama, M. (2014). Colaboración y redes sociales en la enseñanza universitaria. Comunicar, nº 42, 55-63.
  • Gonçalves, S.; Montero, L. & Lamas, E. (2012). E-Portfolio na Formaçao de Profesores. Estudo de Caso Múltiplo. European Review of Artistic Studies, 3, 54-66.
  • Gros, B. (2008). Aprendizajes, conexiones y artefactos. La producción colaborativa del conocimiento. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
  • Hamid, Waycott, Kurnia, & Chang (2014). An empirical study of lecturers' appropriation of social technologies for higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30 (3), 295–311.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Enseñar en la sociedad del conocimiento. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Herrington, J.; Oliver, R. & Reeves, T. (2003). Patterns of engagement in Authentic Online Learning Environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 19, 1, 5971.
  • Hew, K. F. (2011). Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662-676.
  • Huber, G. (2008). Aprendizaje activo y metodologías educativas. Revista de Educación, extraordinary number, 59-81.
  • Järvelä, S. & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Records, 113, 2, pp. 350-374.
  • Klenowski, V. (2004). Desarrollo de portafolios para el aprendizaje y la evaluación. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Krebs, V. (2008). An Introduction to Social Network Analysis. Avaliable in: http://www.orgnet.con/sna.html.
  • Kuo, T., & Tang, H. L. (2014). Relationships among personality traits, Facebook usages, and leisure activitiese. A case of Taiwanese college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 13-19.
  • Lave; J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview. ELI Paper 1. Educase Learning Iniciative. Avaliable in:
  • Luckin, R., Puntambekar, S., Goodyear, P., Grabowski, B. L., Underwood, J., & Winters, N. (2013). Handbook of design in educational technology. London: Routledge.
  • Lueddeke, G. (2008). Reconciling research Teaching and Scholarship in Higher Education: An examination of Diciplinary Variation, the Curriculum and Learning. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2,1. Avaliable in:
  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J. & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: 'It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work'. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2), 141-155.
  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2014). Does Facebook provide educational value? An overview of theoretical and empirical advancements and critical issues. In G. Mallia (Ed.), The social classroom: Integrating social network use in education (pp. 311–336). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Martínez, M. (2006). La investigación cualitativa (Síntesis conceptual). Revista IPPSI, 1(9), 123146.
  • Montero, L. & Gewerc, A. (2013). De las redes sociales para el ocio a las redes sociales para la Academia. Un estudio de caso. In D. Aranda, A. Creus & J. Sánchez Navarro (eds.). Educación, medios digitales y cultura de la participación (pp. 197-222). Barcelona: UOC Press Collection.
  • Montero. L. & Álvarez Seoane C. D. (2010). Elaboración de e-portafolios en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en la universidad. Cruce de miradas. In Mª J. Agra et al. Trabajar con (e) portafolios. Docencia, investigación e innovación en la universidad. (Publicado en CD ISBN: 978-84-693-3740-0).
  • Pintrich, P. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Student. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 4, 385-407.
  • Pintrich, P., D. Smith, T. García & W. McKeachie (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning: University of Michigan.
  • Pintrinch, P.R. (2000).The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of self regulation, 451-499.
  • Rambe, P. (2013). Converged social media: Identity management and engagement on Facebook, Mobile and blogs. Australasian Journal of Educational Tecnology, 2013, 29 (3). 315-336.
  • Roblyer, M.D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. & Witty, J.V. (2010). “Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites”. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134-140.
  • Rodríguez-Groba, A. & Fraga, F. (2015). ¿Pueden las redes académicas ser puente entre la auto y la socioregulación? Un estudio de caso. In Proceedings of XXIII JUTE (Jornadas Universitarias de Tecnología Educativa). Badajoz: Universidad de Extremadura.
  • Rodríguez-Groba, A. & Gewerc, A. (2014). Relaciones entre el uso de redes sociales en la enseñanza y la motivación del alumnado. Estudio de casos en la USC. In Proceedings of XXIII JUTE (Jornadas Universitarias de Tecnología Educativa). Toledo: Universidad de Toledo.
  • Rodríguez-Groba, A., Gewerc, A, Vázquez, B. & Lama, M. (2015). Softlearn: una herramienta para evaluar y acompañar la creación de e-portfolio. Girona: UNIVEST.
  • Rodriguez-Groba, A., Vázquez, B., Lama, M. & Gewerc, A. (2014). Softlearn: A process mining platform for the discovery of learning paths. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), IEEE 14th International Conference on Learning Technologies (pp. 373-375).
  • Rodríguez-Hoyos, C., Haya Salmón, I & Fernández-Díaz, E. (2015). Research on SNS and education: The state of the art and its challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 1, 100111.
  • Rubia, B., Jorri , I. & Anguita , R. (2009) Aprendizaje colaborativo y TIC. En Juan de Pablos (Coord.) Tecnología Educativa. La formación del profesorado en la era de Internet. (pp. 191-214). Málaga: Aljibe.
  • Rué, J. (2009). El aprendizaje autónomo en Educación Superior. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Salmerón, H. & Gutierrez-Barojos, C. (2012). La competencia de aprender a aprender y el aprendizaje autoregulado. Posicionamientos Teóricos. Editorial. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 16,1.
  • Saz, A., Coll, C., Bustos, A. & Engel, A. (2011). The construction of Knowledge in Personal Learning Environments. A Constructivist perspective. In Proceedings of The PLE Conference 2011, 10th 12th July 2011. Southampton, UK. Avaliable in:
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students' education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174.
  • Shulman, L. (2004). Teaching as community property: putting an end to pedagogical solicitude. In Teaching as Community Property: Essays on Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Siemens, G. (2010). “What Are Learning Analytics?” Elearnspace. Avaliable in:
  • Siemens, G. & Weller, M. (2011). El impacto de las redes sociales en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 8 (1), 157163.
  • Thoms, B. (2011). A dynamic social feedback system to support learning and social interaction in higher education. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 4(4), 340-352.
  • Vermunt, J. D. & Vermetten, I. J. (2004). Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 4, 59-384.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978) Interaction between learning and development. In Vygotsky, L, Mind in Society, (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Winnes, P.H. y Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts; P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner, (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 531-566),San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
  • Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Chi-Wai Kwok, R (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 5 (2), 14941503.
  • Zaidieh, A.J.Y. (2012). The use of Social Networking in Education: Challenges and Oportununities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), 1 (2), 18-21.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of Self Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Shunk (Eds.). Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theorical Perspectives (pp. 1-37). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.