A predictive study of reading comprehension in third-grade Spanish students

  1. López Escribano, Carmen
  2. Elosúa de Juan, María Rosa
  3. Gómez Veiga, Isabel
  4. García Madruga, Juan Antonio
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 25

Issue: 2

Pages: 199-205

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Antecedentes: el estudio de la contribución de habilidades lingüísticas y cognitivas a la comprensión lectora es un objetivo relevante de la investigación actual de la lectura. Sin embargo, la comprensión lectora no es fácilmente explicada ni medida por una única prueba ya que los diferentes test de comprensión varían en el tipo de tareas utilizadas y en las demandas cognitivas requeridas. Método: el presente estudio examina la contribución de habilidades lingüísticas y cognitivas (decodificación, reconocimiento de palabras, velocidad lectora, inteligencia verbal y no verbal y memoria de trabajo) a la comprensión lectora, evaluada por dos test que utilizan diferentes tareas y requieren diferentes habilidades. Resultados: la medida de velocidad en pseudopalabras predijo la comprensión evaluada por el test PROLEC-R. Sin embargo, la medida de reconocimiento de palabras (la tarea de elección ortográfica) y la medida de memoria de trabajo verbal predijeron la comprensión medida por el test DARC. Conclusiones: estos resultados muestran, por un lado, que la velocidad lectora y el reconocimiento de palabras son mejores predictores de la comprensión en español que la precisión lectora, y por el otro, que el test de comprensión lectora utilizado es una variable crítica cuando analizamos e interpretamos resultados sobre este tema.

Bibliographic References

  • Aguilar, M., Navarro, J.I., Menacho, I., Alcalde, C., Marchena, E., & Ramiro, P. (2010). Velocidad de nombrar y conciencia fonológica en el aprendizaje inicial de la lectura [Naming speed and phonological awareness in early reading learning]. Psicothema, 22(3), 436-442.
  • August, D., Francis, D.J., Hsu, H.A., & Snow, C.E. (2006). Assessing reading comprehension in bilinguals. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 221-238.
  • Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Betjemann R.S., Keenan J.M., Olson R.K., & Defries J.C. (2011). Choice of reading comprehension test inffuences the outcomes of genetic analyses. Scientiffc Studies of Reading, 15(4), 363-382.
  • Braten, I., Lie, A., Andreassen, R., & Olaussen, B.S. (2009). Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 65-88.
  • Casillas, A., & Goikoetxea, E. (2007). Syllable, onset-rhyme, and phoneme as predictors of early reading and spelling. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30(2), 245-259.
  • Catts, H.W., Key, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientiffc Studies of Reading, 3, 331-361.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R: Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores, revisada [Evaluation of reading processes for children, revised edition] (2nd ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Cutting, L.E., & Scarborough, H.S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientiffc Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277-299.
  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
  • Davies, R., Cuetos, F., & González-Seijas, R. (2007). Reading development and dyslexia in a transparent orthography: A survey of Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57(2), 179-198.
  • Deffor, S., Justicia, F., & Martos, F.J. (1996). The inffuence of lexical and sublexical variables in normal and poor Spanish readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8(6), 487-497.
  • Elosúa, M.R., García Madruga, J.A., Gómez-Veiga, I., López-Escribano, C., Pérez, E., & Orjales, I. (2012). Comprensión lectora y rendimiento académico en 3º y 6º de Primaria: aspectos evolutivos y educativos [Reading abilities and academic performance in 3rd and 6th year primary school: Developmental and educational aspects]. Estudios de Psicología, 33(2), 207-218.
  • Escribano, C.L. (2007). Evaluation of the double-deffcit hypothesis subtype classiffcation of readers in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 319-331.
  • Escribano, C.L. (2010, July). Precursors of word reading from kindergarten to first grade in two groups of monolingual Spanish-speakers. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for the Scientiffc Studies of Reading, Berlin.
  • Francis, D.J., Snow, C.E., August, D., Carlson, C.D., Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2006). Measures of reading comprehension: A latent variable analysis of the diagnostic assessment of reading comprehension. Scientiffc Studies of Reading, 10(3), 301-322.
  • Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2005). Psychometrics approaches to the identification of learning disabilities: IQ and achievement scores are not sufffcient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98-110.
  • Gómez-Velázquez, F., González-Garrido, A., Zarabozo, D., & Amano, M. (2010). La velocidad de denominación de letras. El mejor predictor temprano del desarrollo lector en español [Rapid automatized naming of letters: The best early predictor of reading development in Spanish]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(46), 823-847.
  • Goswami, U. (2010). Typical reading development and developmental dyslexia across languages. In D. Coch, G. Dawson, & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Human behaviour, learning, and the developing brain. Atypical development (pp. 145-167). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jiménez, J.E., & Ortiz, M. (2000). Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje de la lectura: teoría, evaluación e intervención [Phonological awareness and reading learning: Theory, assessment, and intervention]. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
  • Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2000). K-BIT, Test breve de inteligencia de Kaufman [Kaufman brief intelligence test]. Madrid: Pearson.
  • Kim, Y.S., & Pallante, D. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(1), 1-22.
  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
  • Lipka, O., & Siegel, L.S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientiffc Studies of Reading, 11(2), 105-131.
  • López-Higes, R., Mayoral, J.A., & Villoria, C. (2002). Batería de evaluación de la lectura (BEL) [Reading assessment battery]. Madrid: Psymtec.
  • OECD-PISA key findings (2009). Retrieved May 21, 2012, from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa2009keyffndings.htm.
  • Perfetti, C.A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357-383.
  • Prueba de conocimientos y destrezas indispensables (2010). [Essential Knowledge and Skills Test, 2010]. Retrieved May 21, 2012, from: http://www.espormadrid.es/2010/03/prueba-de-conocimientos-y-destrezas.html.
  • Rodrigo, M., & Jiménez, J.E. (2000). IQ vs phonological recoding skill in explaining differences between poor readers and normal readers in word recognition: Evidence from a naming task. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 129-142.
  • Share, D.L., McGee, R., & Silva, P.D. (1989). I.Q. and reading progress: A test of the capacity notion of IQ. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 97-100.
  • Share, D.L., & Leikin, M. (2004). Language impairment at school entry and later reading disability: Connections at lexical and supra-lexical levels of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 87-110.
  • Stanovich, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Tannenbaum, K.R., Torgesen, J.K., & Wagner, R.K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381-398.
  • Wolf, M., & Denckla, M.B. (2005). Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests (RAN/RAS). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Data source: Dialnet