El uso de e-rúbricas para la evaluación de competencias en estudiantes universitariosestudio sobre viabilidad del instrumento

  1. Valverde Berrocoso, Jesús
  2. Ciudad Gómez, Adelaida
Revista:
REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria

ISSN: 1696-1412 1887-4592

Año de publicación: 2014

Título del ejemplar: Evaluación Formativa mediante E-rúbricas

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4995/REDU.2014.6415 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Accino Domínguez, J. A., & Lozano Rosch, E. (2011). Servicio federado de eRúbrica para evaluación formativa. RedIRIS: boletín de la Red Nacional de I+D RedIRIS, (90), 46-54.
  • Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: Tools for Making Learning Goals and Evaluation Criteria Explicit for Both Teachers and Learners. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 5(3), 197-203. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-06-0168.
  • Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
  • Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
  • Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: the good, the bad and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-30.
  • Andrade, H. G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment in Learning to Write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21-34.
  • Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment on Elementary School Students’ Writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3-13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
  • Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(2), 153-170. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.006
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007a). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114-129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007b). Teachers’ opinions on quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 857-867. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.043
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007c). Determining the quality of competence assessment programs: a self-evaluation procedure. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3–4), 258-281. doi:10.1016/j. stueduc.2007.07.004
  • Baryla, E., Shelley, G., & Trainor, W. (2012). Transforming Rubrics Using Factor Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(4).
  • Bose, K. S., & Sarma, R. H. (1975). Delineation of the intimate details of the backbone conformation of pyridine nucleotide coenzymes in aqueous solution. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 66(4), 1173-1179.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. As sessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. doi:10.1080/ 02602930600679050
  • Bresciani, M. J., Oakleaf, M., Kolkhorst, F., Nebeker, C., Barlow, J., Duncan, K., & Hickmott, J. (2009). Examining Design and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Rubric Measuring Research Quality across Multiple Disciplines. Practical Assessment, Research & Eva luation, 14(12).
  • Brown, G. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London ; New York: Routledge. Brown, G. T. L., Glasswell, K., & Harland, D. (2004). Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing, 9(2), 105-121. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001
  • Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2008). La evaluación formativa mediante e-rúbicas. Indivisa: Boletín de estudios e investigación, (10), 197-208.
  • Cebrián De la Serna, M., Martínez Figueira, M. E., Gallego Arrufat, M. J., & Raposo Rivas, M. (2011). La e-rúbrica para la evaluación: una experiencia de colaboración interuniversitaria en materia TIC. En II Conbreso Internacional Usos y Buenas Prácticas TIC. Málaga.
  • Chow, Y. W., Pietranico, R., & Mukerji, A. (1975a). Studies of oxygen binding energy to hemoglobin molecule. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 66(4), 1424-1431.
  • Chow, Y. W., Pietranico, R., & Mukerji, A. (1975b). Studies of oxygen binding energy to hemoglobin molecule. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 66(4), 1424-1431.
  • Ciudad Gómez, A. (2010). Teaching Innovation and Use of the ICT in the Teaching-Learning Process within the New Framework of the EHEA, By Means Of Moodle Platform. American Journal of Business Education, 3(13), 13-20.
  • Ciudad Gómez, A. (2011). Design of the Accounting Course Focusing On the Development of Competences, Journal of International Education Research, 7(5),15-22.
  • Ciudad Gómez, A. & Valverde Berrocoso, J. (2012). Design of a Competency-Based Assessment Model in the field of Accounting, Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 5(5), 343-348.
  • D’Antoni, A., Zipp, G., & Olson, V. (2009). Interrater reliability of the mind map as sessment rubric in a cohort of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 1-8. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-19
  • East, M. (2009). Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing. Assessing Writing, 14(2), 88-115. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.001
  • Fernández March, A. (2010). La evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en un modelo de formación por competencias en la educación universitaria. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1).
  • Gibbs, G. (2006). Why assessment is changing. En C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 11-22). New York: Routledge.
  • Guzmán Cedillo, Y. I., Flores Macías, R. del C., & Tirado Segura, F. (2012). La evaluación de la competencia argumentativa en foros de discusión en línea a través de rúbricas. Revista Innovación Educativa, 12(60), 17-40.
  • Halonen, J. S., Bosck, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill IV, G. W., … Whitlock, K. (2003). A Rubric for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing Scientific Inquiry in Psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196.
  • Huber, E., & Harvey, M. (2013). Time to participate: Lessons from the literature for learning and teaching project evaluation in higher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 240-249. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.004
  • Ibarra Sáiz, M., Rodríguez Gómez, G., & Gómez Ruiz, M. A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de educación, (359), 206-231.
  • Ibarra Saiz, M. S., & Rodríguez Gómez, G. (2010). Los procedimientos de evaluación como elementos de desarrollo de la función orientadora en la universidad. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 21(2), 443-461.
  • Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. doi:10.1016/j. edurev.2007.05.002
  • Lovorn, M. G., & Rezaei, A. R. (2011). Assessing the Assessment: Rubrics Training for Pre-Service and New In-Service Teachers. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16(16), 1-18.
  • Martínez Figueira, M. E., & Raposo Rivas, M. (2011). La evaluación del estudiante a través de la rúbrica. En Xornada de Innovación Educativa 2011. Vigo.
  • McGoldrick, K., & Peterson, B. (2013). Using rubrics in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 12(0), 33-47. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2013.04.009
  • Messick, S. (1996). Validity of Performance Assessments. En Phillips, G.W. (Ed.), Technical Issues in Large-Scale Performance Assessment (pp. 11-28). Washington, DC: NCES - National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Monreal Gimeno, M. del C., & Terrón Caro, M. T. (2010). Evaluación de competencias en la doble titulación de trabajo social y educación social: una experiencia interdisciplinar. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1).
  • Mora, J. J. (2010). Rubrics as an Evaluation Tool in Economics (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1578439). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  • Navarro Soria, I., & González Gómez, C. (2010). La autoevaluación y la evaluación entre iguales como estrategia para el desarrollo de competencias profesionales: una experiencia docente en el grado de maestro. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1).
  • Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(0), 129-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
  • Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (s.f.). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, (0). doi:10.1016/j. stueduc.2013.10.005
  • Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806-813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007.
  • Penny, J., Johnson, R. L., & Gordon, B. (2000). The effect of rating augmentation on interrater reliability: An empirical study of a holistic rubric. Assessing Writing, 7(2), 143-164. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00012-X.
  • Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s Wrong--and What’s Right--with Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 72-75.
  • Porto Currás, M. (2009). Evaluación de estudiantes en la universidad de Santiago de Compostela: percepciones de los propios alumnos. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, (3).
  • Quesada Serra, V., Rodríguez Gómez, G., & Ibarra Sáiz, M. (2013). ActEval: un instrumento para el análisis y reflexión sobre la actividad evaluadora del profesorado universitario. Revista de educación, (362), 69-104.
  • Raposo, M., & Martínez, E. (2011). La Rúbrica en la Enseñanza Universitaria: Un Recurso Para la Tutoría de Grupos de Estudiantes. Formación universitaria, 4(4), 19-28. doi:10.4067/S0718-50062011000400004
  • Reddy, M. Y. (2007). Rubrics and the enhancement of student learning. Educate~, 7(1), 3 - 17.
  • Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
  • Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-Referenced Assessment in Teacher Preparation: An Opportunity to Learn by Using. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(8), 1-9.
  • Rezaei, A. R., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 18-39. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
  • Robin, T., & Marielle, S. (2004). What’s still wrong with rubrics: Focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9(2).
  • Rodríguez Gómez, G., & Ibarra Saiz, M. S. (2012). Reflexiones en torno a la competencia evaluadora del profesorado en la Educación Superior. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10(2).
  • Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
  • Santos, J., & Lavin, A. M. (2004). Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Assessing Outcomes When Students Think Like Economists. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(2), 148- 161. doi:10.2307/30042586
  • Schmoldt, A., Benthe, H. F., & Haberland, G. (1975). Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes. Biochemical Pharmacology, 24(17), 1639-1641.
  • Vaccaro, A. M., Raschetti, R., Ricciardi, G., & Morpurgo, G. (1975). Temperature adaptation at the hemoglobin level in Carassius auratus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. A, Comparative Physiology, 52(4), 627-634.
  • Villalustre Martínez, L., & Moral Pérez, M. E. del. (2010). E-portafolios y rúbricas de evaluación en ruralnet. Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación, (37), 93-105.
  • Walstad, W. B. (2001). Improving Assessment in University Economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 32(3), 281-294. doi:10.2307/1183385