University-school scenarios and voices from classroomsRethinking collaboration within the framework of an interuniversity project

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abdallah, M. M. S. (2017). Towards improving content and instruction of the ‘TESOL/TEFL for Special Needs’ course: an action research study. Educational Action Research, 25(3), 420–437. https://doi.org10.108009650792.2016.1173567
• Adams, G. (2017). Using a narrative approach to illuminate teacher professional learning in an era of accountability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.007
• Ainscow,M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: what are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4
• Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. (2001). The Dropout Process in Life Course Perspective: Early Risk Factors at Home and School. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 760–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00134
• Alonso, I., & Berasategi, N. (2017). The integrated curriculum, university teacher identity and teaching culture: the effects of an interdisciplinary activity. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.7821naer.2017.7.235
• Anderson, G. (2017). Participatory Action Research (PAR) as Democratic Disruption: New Public Management and Educational Research in Schools and Universities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(5), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017 .1303211
• Arvanitakis, J., & Hornsby, D. J. (2016). Universities, the citizen scholar and the future of higher education. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538697
• Beberley, J. (2010). Theses on subalternity, representation, and politics. Postcolonial Studies, 1(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688799889987
• Brown, M. (2008). Comfort zone: Model or metaphor? Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401019
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard. Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut: Creek, Cal: Left Coast Press.
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1991). Narrative and story in practice and research. In C. Witherell &N.Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 259–281). New York: Teachers College.
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Cochram-Smith, M., & Little, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside. Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press. COM. (2007). Improving the Quality of Teacher Education. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Retrieved fromRetrievedfromhttp://eur-lex.europa .eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52007DC0392
• Cook, T. (2015). Harnessing the power and impact of creative disruption. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1099977
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
• Cortés, P., Rivas, J. I., & Leite, A. (2016). Education and social change in Spain: from crisis to opportunity. Ethnography and Education, 11(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2016.1147971
• Darling-Hammond, L., Pacheco, A., Michelli, N., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Youngs, P. (2005). ImplementingCurriculumRenewal in Teacher Education: ManagingOrganizational and Policy Change. In L.
• Darling-Hammond& J. Bransford (Eds.), Implementing CurriculumRenewal in Teacher Education: Managing Organizational and Policy Change (pp. 442–478). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• De Oliveira, J., & Gallardo-Echenique, E. (2015). Early Childhood Student Teachers’ Observation and Experimentation of Creative Practices as a Design Processes. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.4.122
• Díaz, R., Lamb, B., Wesch, M., Ito, M., & Gil, F. G. (2012). Expanded Education. Retrieved from http://www.international.zemos98.orgIMG/pdf/expanded_education.pdf
• Drescher, T. (2017). The Potential of Modelling Co-Teaching in Pre-Service. Education, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(3). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1764&context=jutlp
• Edward-Groves, C., & Kemmis, S. (2016). Pedagogy, education and praxis: understanding new forms of intersubjectivity through action research and practice theory. Educational Action Research, 24(1), 177–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1076730
• Fernández-Díaz, E., Fernández-Olaskoaga, L., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2017). Collaborative Action Research through technologicallymediated agoras. Educational ActionResearch, 25(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1141107
• Forés, A., Sanchez-Valero, J. A., & Sancho, J. M. (2015). Leaving comfort zone. Dilemmas and challenges in the European Higher Education Space. Tendencias Pedagógicas [Pedagogical Tendences], 23, 205–214. Retrieved from https://revistas.uam.es/tendenciaspedagogicas/article/ view/2080/2178
• Fouche, C. B., & Chubb, L. A. (2015). Action researchers encountering ethical review: a literature synthesis on challenges and strategies. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1128956
• Frymier, A., & Houser, M. (2000). The teacher student relationship as interpersonal Relationship. Communication Education, 58(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books.
• Giroux, E. (2016). Higher Education and the politics of disruption. Entramados, Educación y Sociedad, [Frameworks: Education and Society], 3, 15–26. Retrieved from http://fh.mdp.edu .ar/revistas/index.php/entramados/article/view/1615/1614
• Hansen, D. T. (2014). Cosmopolitanism as cultural creativity: New modes of educational practice in globalizing times. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12039
• Harrison, C. (2013). Collaborative action research as a tool for generating formative feedback on teachers’ classroom assessment practice: The KREST project. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741839
• Hernández-Hernández, F., & Sancho, J. M. (2017). Life histories and narratives about subalternity: Facing the challenge of the intractable in relation with the other. Educar, 54(1), 15–29. https:// doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.913
• Jordan, S., & Kapoor, D. (2016). Re-politicizing participatory action research: unmasking neoliberalism and the illusions of participation. Educational Action Research, 24(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1105145
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2013). Participatory action research. Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 271–328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lafuente, A., & Lara, T. (2013). Situated learning and practices procomunals. RASE Journal, 6(2), 168–177.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
• Li, X., Kenzy, P., Underwood, L., & Severson, L. (2015). Dramatic Impact of Action Research of Arts-Based Teaching on At-Risk Students. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1042983
• M., A., & Dubula, V. (2016). Walking the Walk? Critical reflections from an Afro-Irish emancipatory research network. Educational Action Research, 24(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1132242
• Margalef, R., & Pareja, L. (2008). Innovation, Research and Professional Development in Higher Education: Learning fromOurOwn Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 104– 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.007
• McFadden, A., & Smeaton, K. (2017). Amplifying Student Learning through Volunteering. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(3). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1710&context=jutlp
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 429–444). London: Sage Publication.
• Ng, W., Nicholas, H., & Williams, A. (2010). School experience influences on pre-service teachers’ evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching andTeacher Education, 26, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.010
• Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning: a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00042 -2
• Nind, M. (2014). What is inclusive research? London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate .2017.06.013
• Pence, H. M., & Macgillivray, I. K. (2008). The Impact of an International Field Experience on Preservice Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.003
• Price, J. (2001). Action research, pedagogy and change: The transformative potential of Action research in preservice teacher education. Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270118039
• Rice, E. H. (2002). The Collaboration Process in Professional Development Schools. Results of a Meta-Ethnography, 1990-1998. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001006
• Rivas, J. I. (2014). New identity in teacher education: students’ voices. International Journal of Development and Educational Psychology, 7(1), 487–494. Retrieved from http://www.infad.eu/RevistaINFAD/OJS/index.php/IJODAEP/issue/view/16
• Rivas, J. I., Leite, A. E., Márquez, M. J., Cortés, P., Prados, M. E., & Padua, D. (2016). Facebook as a virtual place to share learning between groups of students from different universities. RELATEC, Latin American Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 55–66.
• Rowell, L. L., & Hong, E. (2017). Knowledge democracy and action research: Pathways for the Twenty-First Century. In L. L. Rowell, C. D. Bruce, J. M. Shosh, & M. M. Riel (Eds.),The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research (pp. 63–83). New York: PalgraveMacmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_5
• Sancho, J., & Padilla, P. (2016). Promoting digital competence in secondary education: are schools there? Insights from a case study. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.1.157
• Sanz, J., & Gutiérrez, L. (2016). Scientific workshops with children in the early childhood education degree: a model of action research and a university-school initiative. Campo Abierto [Open Field Journal], 35(1), 205–216. Retrieved from http://mascvuex.unex.es/revistas/index.php/campoabierto/article/view/2844
• Schiro, M. S. (2008). CurriculumTheory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
• Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014
• Sousa, B. (2006). The university in the 21st century: Toward a democratic and emancipatory university reform. In R. A. Rhoads & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization inTheAmericas (pp. 60–100). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
• Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2008). Narrative constructionist inquiry. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 295–314). London: Guilford Publications.
• Stosich, E. I. (2016). Building teacher and school capacity to teach to ambitious standards in highpoverty schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.010
• Sutherland, L.M., Howard, S., &Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers’ understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006
• Thomson, P. (2015). Action Research with/against Impact. Educational Action Research, 23(3), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1062235
• Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of open educational resource. Initiatives in Higher Education. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38645447.pdf
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Zeichner, K., & Conklin, H. (2008). Teacher education programs as sites for teacher preparation. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts (pp. 269–289). New York: Routledge.