Reconstruyendo la materia de Didáctica de la Educación Física desde la perspectiva autobiográfica del alumnado

  1. Raúl Eirín Nemiña 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 37

Pages: 628-633

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V0I41.81815 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the experiences and memories of Physical Education classes (PE) that have the students of the subject of Didactics of PE of the degree of Primary Education of the USC. It has been done analyzing the discourse presented by the students of the subject, relying on the theory of autobiographical memory, through autobiographical texts of their memories of school PE. The participants were 60 students (47 women and 13 men) of the subject Didactic of PE. To access his autobiographies, elaborate accounts of his school memories have been used. The analysis of the data has been used from a naturalistic inquiry approach (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) through the repeated reading of the texts elaborated by the students, identifying recurring themes and patterns that result in the establishment of provisional categories that once settled, they form the central themes and content of the discourse expressed in the texts. These are grouped around pleasant and positive memories, negative memories and influences of the teacher. These conceptions that the future teachers bring serve as a context to confront them with an idea of school PE that breaks these stereotypes. Based on an inclusive and integrative idea of PE, we favour the acquisition of a critical spirit so that, as future teachers of primary education, they construct their own meanings of PE in the school and in their professional identity.

Bibliographic References

  • Allison, P. C., Pissanos, B. W. & Sakola, S. P. (1990). Physical education revisited: The institutional biographies of preservice classroom teachers, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61(5), 76 – 79.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191 – 215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).
  • Belka, D. E., Lawson, H. A. & Cross-Lipnickey, S. C. (1991). An exploratory study of undergraduate recruitment into several major programs at one university, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10(3), 286 – 306.
  • Beltrán-Carrillo, V. J. & Devís-Devís, J. (2019). El pensamiento del alumnado inactivo sobre sus experiencias negativas en educación física: los discursos del rendimiento, salutismo y masculinidad hegemónica. RICYDE. Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte. 55(15), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2019.05502.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, vol. 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Bullough, R.V. & Gitlin, A. (2001). Becoming a student of teaching: Methodologies for exploring self and school context. 2nd ed. Madison: Brown and Benchmark.
  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. En D. C. Berliner y R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York, NY, US: Macmillan Library Reference Usa; London, England: Prentice Hall International.
  • Costillo Borrego, E., Borrachero Cortés, A., Brígido Mero, M. & Mellado Jiménez, V. (2013). Las emociones sobre la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias y las matemáticas de futuros profesores de Secundaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 10 , 514-532.
  • Crum, B. J. (1993). Conventional thought and practice in physical education: problems of teaching and implications for change, Quest, 45, 339 – 356.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform; policies must keep pace with new ideas about what, when, and how teachers learn and must focus on developing schools' and teachers' capacities to be responsible for student learning. Phi Delta Kappa, vol. 92 (6), 81-102.https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622
  • Doolittle, S. A., Dodds, P. & Placek, J. H. (1993). Persistence of beliefs about teaching during formal training of preservice teachers, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12(4), 355– 365.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. En The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the perception of teachers, Murray F.B. (Edt.) 63 – 91. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Gómez, C. J., Rodríguez, R. A., & Mirete, A. B. (2016). Relación entre metodología docente y uso de recursos de innovación en la enseñanza de la historia. Un análisis a través de los recuerdos de los maestros en formación. Clío. History and History Teaching, 42. Recuperado de http://clio.rediris.es
  • González-Calvo, G. y Barba, J. J. (2013). «Perspectiva autobiográfica de un docente novel sobre los aprendizajes de Educación Física en diferentes niveles educativos en educación física». Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 24, 171-181.
  • González Calvo, G. y Barba, J. J. (2014). Formación permanente y desarrollo de la identidad reflexiva del profesorado desde las perspectivas grupal e individual. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(3), 397-412. Recuperado de http://www.ugr.es/local/recfpro/rev181COL12.pdf.
  • González Calvo, G., & Martínez Álvarez, L. (2018). Los Diarios Corporales Docentes como Instrumentos de Reflexión y de Evaluación Formativa en el Prácticum de Formación Inicial del Profesorado. Estudios PedagóGicos, 44(2), 185-204. doi:10.4067/S0718-07052018000200185
  • Impedovo, M. (2016). In-service Teachers’ Sense of Agency after Participation in a Research Master Course. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(3), 281-307. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2016.2206.
  • Keating, X. D., Silverman, S. & Kulinna, P. H. (2002). Preservice physical education teacher attitudes toward fitness tests and the factors influencing their attitudes, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 193 – 207.
  • Kretchmar, R.S. (2006). Ten More Reasons for Quality Physical Education, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 77:9, 6-9. DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2006.10597932
  • Lawson, H. A. (1986). Occupational socialization and the design of teacher education programs, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5(2), 107 – 116.
  • Le Fevre, D., & Richardson, V. (2002). Staff development in early reading intervention programs: The facilitator. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 18(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00011-2
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage.
  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: UCP.
  • McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). Challenging prospective teachers’ beliefs during early field experiences: A quixotic undertaking? Journal of Teacher Education 41, no. 3: 12 – 20.
  • Monforte, J., & Pérez-Samaniego, V. (2017). El miedo en Educación Física: una historia reconocible. Movimento, 23(1), 85-100
  • Moreno, J. A. & Hellín, M. G. (2007). El interés del alumnado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria hacia la Educación Física. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 9(2), 1-20.
  • Morgan, P., & Bourke, S. (2008). Non-specialist teachers’ confidence to teach PE: The nature and influence of personal school experiences in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 1 – 29.
  • O’Sullivan, M. (2005). Learning to teach physical education. In Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction, ed. S. Silverman and C. Ennis, 315 – 37. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research. 62 (3), 307 – 32.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation and methods (3rd edn) (Beverly Hills, Sage)
  • Placek, J. H., Dodds, P., Doolittle, S. A., Portman, P. A., Ratliffe, T. A. & Pinkham, K. M. (1995). Teaching recruits’ physical education backgrounds and beliefs about purposes for their subject matter, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14(3), 246 – 261.
  • Portman, P. A. (1996). Preservice elementary education majors beliefs about their elementary phys- ical education classes (Pt. 1), Indiana Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance Journal, 25(2), 25 – 28.
  • Sinelnikov, O. A., & Hastie, P. A. (2010). Students’ autobiographical memory of participation in multiple sport education seasons. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 167 – 183.
  • Sugrue, C. (1996). Student teacher lay theories: Implications for professional development. En Teachers’ professional lives, Goodson, I. y Hargreaves, A. (Eds.) 154 – 77. London: Falmer Press.
  • Tsangaridou, N. & O’Sullivan, M. (2003). Physical Education Teachers’ Theories of Action and Theories-In-Use. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22:2, 132-152.
  • Valencia-Peris A. & Lizandra, J. (2018). Cambios en la representación social de la educación física en la formación inicial del profesorado. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 34, 230-235