Indicadores altmétricos y de citación en la producción científica en ScienceOpenestudio descriptivo para Brasil, España y Portugal

  1. Travieso Rodríguez, Críspulo
  2. Ferreira de Araújo, Ronaldo
Journal:
Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación

ISSN: 1683-8947,  0006-176X

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 14

Issue: 2

Pages: 124-137

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación

Abstract

Objective. To describe evidences of certain bibliographic issues and their influence on altmetrics and bibliometrics indicators, considering a set of Brazilian, Spanish and Portuguese articles.Design/Methodology/Approach. From an exploratory approach, a total of 133 articles, available in ScienceOpen and best-positioned from the altmetrics counts, have been analyzed according to characteristics as publication date, authorship and collaboration, subject area, language, number of citations and, finally, altmetrics values derived from altmetric attention scores and mentions collected by Altmetric.Results/Discussion. Data show differences among countries regarding some issues – for example, number of authors by article, or language of publication - for the best-positioned articles in altmetrics rankings. For the whole sample, it is remarkable that more recent articles obtain more mentions and shared authorship is usual.  Conclusions. Altmetrics evaluate visibility and reception of academic articles in web and social media, so they enrich citation data and extend the scope of the scientific production beyond the academic community. It is required to study and understand the social impact of science and to identify which elements of the publication process have direct influences over the popularization of scientific research. Originality/Value. Besides of dealing with a sample of Ibero-american articles, usually underrepresented in bibliometric databases, this study emphasizes the complementary role of the different dimensions that have to be taken into account in scientific communication.

Bibliographic References

  • Alcíbar, M. (2015). Comunicación pública de la ciencia y la tecnología: una aproximación crítica a su historia conceptual. Arbor, 191(773), a242.
  • Alperin, J. P. (2015). Geographic variation in social media metrics: An analysis of Latin American journal articles. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 289-304. doi:10.1108/AJIM-12-2014-0176.
  • Araújo, R. F. (2015). Marketing científico digital e métricas alternativas para periódicos: da visibilidade ao engajamento. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 20(3), 67-84.
  • Araújo, R. F., Caran, G. M., & Souza, I. V. P. (2016). Orientação temática e coeficiente de correlação para análise comparativa entre altmetrics e citações. Em Questão, 22(3), 184-200. doi: 10.19132/1808-5245223.184-200.
  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Sciences and Technology. 66(10), 1401-4321.
  • Dal-Ré, R., Mahillo-Fernández, I., & Thelwall, M. (2017). Do opinion articles attract more social attention tan original research, relative to their citation counts? European Journal of Internal Medicine, 42, 27–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.03.016.
  • Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39-49.
  • Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics, 107(2), 723-744.
  • Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 1. Recuperado de http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
  • ScienceOpen (2018). Review on ScienceOpen. Recuperado de http://about.scienceopen.com/peer-review-guidelines/
  • Tennant, J. (2017). ScienceOpen supports the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC). Recuperado de http://blog.scienceopen.com/2017/07/scienceopen-supports-initiative-open-citations-i4oc
  • Torres, D., Cabezas, Á., & Jiménez, E. (2013). Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0. Comunicar, XXI(41), 53–60.
Data source: Dialnet