Perfiles docentes en el contexto de la transformación digital de la escuela

  1. María José Sosa Díaz 1
  2. Jesús Valverde Berrocoso 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

Journal:
Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

ISSN: 0210-5934,  2340-6577

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 72

Issue: 1

Pages: 151-173

Type: Article

DOI: 10.13042/BORDON.2020.72965 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

Abstract

The figure of the teacher has a fundamental role in the integration of ICT in schools. The elaboration of teaching profiles has been used in educational research on the pedagogical use of digital technologies. However, there is not yet an explanatory theoretical model that unites all the factors and variables. A model that allows the implementation of ICT integration strategies in the classrooms and which is focused on the needs and characteristics of the teaching staff. This research identifies the different teacher profiles and provides evidence on factors that influence the way in which the different technologies are used in the teaching practice. METHOD. A longitudinal investigation was carried out with a multiple case study using the semi-structured interview as the main method of data collection and the constant comparison procedure of the Grounded Theory as a technique for data analysis. In this study, four Pre-Primary and Primary Education schools have participated together with a team of ICT coordinators, teachers, management staff, families and ICT advisors (n=57). RESULTS. The study concludes with an explanatory theoretical model composed of four profiles of teachers, regarding their use of technologies in the classroom: reluctant, apprentices, managers and e-innovators. DISCUSSION. The most important factors in the implementation of technologies in the teaching practice are identified −which also coincide with other studies. These are the following: digital teaching competence, inservice teacher education, attitudes towards ICT, self-perception and self-confidence, collaboration with expert ITC staff or the perceived pressure in the school context.

€ View funding

Funding information

Plan Integral de Educación Digital (PIED) para la mejora de los resultados de aprendizaje en educación primaria y secundaria. Ayudas destinadas a la realización de proyectos de investigación en los centros públicos de I+D+i de la comunidad autónoma de Extremadura. Junta de Extremadura. Consejería de Economía, Ciencia y Agenda Digital. Unión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. Una manera de hacer Europa. Ref: IB18088.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • ○ Abela, J. A., García-Nieto, A. y Pérez, A. M. (2007). Evolución de la teoría fundamentada como técnica de análisis cualitativo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • ○ Admiraal, W., Louws, M., Lockhorst, D., Paas, T., Buynsters, M., Cviko, A., Janssen, C., de Jonge, M., Nouwens, S., Post, L., van der Ven, F. y Kester, L. (2017). Teachers in school-based technology innovations: a typology of their beliefs on teaching and technology. Computers & Education, 114, 57-68. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.013
  • ○ Badia, A. e Iglesias, S. (2019). The Science teacher identity and the use of technology in the classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 532-541. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09784-w
  • ○ Bhattacharjee, J. y Muddgal, A. (2019). School leadership for sustaining pedagogical innovation such as inquiry based learning in ICT implementation: an experimental evaluation of a high school in India. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), Special issue, 435-437. doi: http://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C1091.1083S19
  • ○ Birisci, S. y Kul, U. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93.
  • ○ Christensen, R., Eichhorn, K., Prestridge, S., Petko, D., Sligte, H., Baker, R., Alayyar, G. y Knezek, G. (2018). Supporting learning leaders for the effective integration of technology into schools. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 457-472. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9385-9
  • ○ Cohen, L. y Manion, L. (2002). Métodos de investigación educativa. Madrid: Morata.
  • ○ Dara Tafazoli, M., Parra, E. G. y Abril, C. A. H. (2019). Attitude towards computer-assisted language learning: do gender, age and educational level matter? Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 22-39.
  • ○ Demiraslan, Y. y Usluel, Y. K. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: using Activity Theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 458-474.
  • ○ Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Londres: SAGE Publications.
  • ○ Donnelly, D., MacGarr, O. y O´Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57, 1469-1483. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.014
  • ○ Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B. y Gerick, J. (2017). Predictors of teachers’ use of ICT in school – the relevance of school characteristics, teachers’ attitudes and teacher collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 551-573. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9476-y
  • ○ Erdogdu, F. y Erdogdu, E. (2015). The impact of access to ICT, student background and school/home environment on academic success of students in Turkey: an international comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 26-49. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.023
  • ○ European Commission (2019). 2nd survey of schools: ICT in education : objective 1 : benchmark progress in ICT in schools, final report. Recuperado de http://publications.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_KK0119079ENN
  • ○ Farjon, D., Smits, A. y Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
  • ○ Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la metodología cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
  • ○ Gewerc, A. y Montero, L. (2013). Cultura, formación y desarrollo profesional. La integración de las TIC en las instituciones educativas. Revista de Educación, 362. doi: http://doi.org/10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-163
  • ○ Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J. y Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: the role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441-449. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057
  • ○ Håkansson Lindqvist, M. y Pettersson, F. (2019). Digitalization and school leadership: on the complexity of leading for digitalization in school. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 218-230. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0126
  • ○ Hall, A. B. y Trespalacios, J. (2019). Personalized professional learning and teacher self-efficacy for integrating technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 221-235. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1647579
  • ○ Hao, Y. y Lee, K. S. (2015). Teachers’ concern about integrating web 2.0 technologies and its relationship with teacher characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 1-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.028
  • ○ Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J. y Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70-83. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009
  • ○ Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K. y Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961
  • ○ Hernández, R., Fernández-Collado, C. y Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill.
  • ○ Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C. y Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in Mathematics, Reading, and Science across 44 countries: a multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1-13. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
  • ○ Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa (2019). TALIS 2018. Estudio internacional de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje. Informe español. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. Recuperado de https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/inee/dam/jcr:047dfc41-acf6-444a-8e4e-4e5916343a88/talis2018-online-20190807.pdf
  • ○ Ipek, I. y Ziatdinov, R. (2017). New approaches and trends in the Philosophy of Educational Technology for learning and teaching environments. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 381-389.
  • ○ Klement, M. (2018). Teachers and ICT tools: typology of teachers in terms of their approaches to and views on modern technologies. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(1), 127-132.
  • ○ Knezek, G. y Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in Primary and Secondary Education. En J. Voogt y G. Knezek (eds.), International handbook of information technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 321-331). Boston, Massachusetts: Springer US. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_19
  • ○ Knezek, G. y Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2
  • ○ Knezek, G., Christensen, R. y Fluke, R. (2003). Testing a will, skill, tool model of technology integration. Presentado en Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, Illinois. Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED475762
  • ○ Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K. y Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795-813. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9
  • ○ Mama, M. y Hennessy, S. (2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Computers & Education, 68, 3-38780. doi: http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.022
  • ○ Morales, C. (2006). Cross-cultural validation of the will, skill, tool model of technology integration. University of North Texas. Recuperado de https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5256/m2/1/high_res_d/dissertation.pdf
  • ○ Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M. y Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 127. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104736
  • ○ Njiku, J., Maniraho, J. F. y Mutarutinya, V. (2019). Understanding teachers’ attitude towards computer technology integration in education: a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3041-3052. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09917-z
  • ○ OECD (2019). TALIS 2018. Results (volume I): teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. París: OECD Publishing.
  • ○ Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts - a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
  • ○ Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449-458. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
  • ○ Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Nueva York: Free Press.
  • ○ Rolf, E., Knutsson, O. y Ramberg, R. (2019). An analysis of digital competence as expressed in design patterns for technology use in teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3361-3375. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12739
  • ○ Salemink, K., Strijker, D. y Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: a systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
  • ○ Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J. y Aldás-Manzano, J. (2017). The effect of age on teachers’ intention to use educational video games: a TAM approach. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(4), 355-366.
  • ○ Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F. y Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
  • ○ Schibeci, R., MacCallum, J., Cumming-Potvin, W., Durrant, C., Kissane, B. y Miller, E. J. (2008). Teachers´ journey towards critical use of ICT. Learning Media and Technology, 33(4), 313-327. doi: 10.1080/17439880802497065
  • ○ Stake, R. E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata.
  • ○ Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia.
  • ○ Suárez, J., Almerich, G., Gargallo, B. y Aliaga, F. M. (2010). Las competencias en TIC del profesorado y su relación con el uso de los recursos tecnológicos. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 18(10), 1-33.
  • ○ Teo, T., Fan, X. y Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: does gender matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235-251.
  • ○ Tilve, M. D. y Álvarez, Q. (2009). Un estudio de caso sobre un proyecto de innovación con TIC en un centro educativo de Galicia: ¿acción o reflexión? Bordón, 61(1), 95-108.
  • ○ Tondeur, J., Valcke, M. y Braak, J. V. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in Primary Education: teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494-506. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00285.x
  • ○ Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J. y Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212-223. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003
  • ○ Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T. y Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3). doi: 10.1111/bjet.12748
  • ○ Trinidad, A., Carrero, V. y Soriano, R. M. (2006). Teoría fundamentada “Grounded Theory”. La construcción de la teoría a través del análisis interpretacional. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • ○ Ursavas, Ö. F., Yalçin, Y. y Bakir, E. (2019). The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in-service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: a multigroup multimodel study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501-2519. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12834
  • ○ Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J. y Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1339-1350. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007
  • ○ Voogt, J. (2010). Teacher factors associated with innovative curriculum goals and pedagogical practices: differences between extensive and non-extensive ICT-using Science teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 453-464. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00373.x
  • ○ Wachira, P. y Keengwe, J. (2010). Technology integration barriers: urban school Mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y
  • ○ Wu, B., Yu, X. y Hu, Y. (2019). How does principal e-leadership affect ICT transformation across different school stages in K-12 education: perspectives from teachers in Shanghai. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1210-1225. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12766
  • ○ Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
  • ○ Zhu, C. (2015). Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 65-79. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.822414
Data source: Dialnet