Estudio de los factores de estudiantes y aulas que intervienen en el 'engagement' y rendimiento académico en Matemáticas Discretas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aizpurua, A., Lizaso, I., & Iturbe, I. (2018). Estrategias de aprendizaje y habilidades de razonamiento de estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.01.001
• Amiripour, P., Dossey, J. A., & Shahvarani, A. (2017). Factor Analysis of Inertia, Capacities, and Educational Performance of At-Risk Students’ Training Centres According to Their Academic Failure in Mathematics Parvaneh. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.461
• Arrieta, M. (1998). Medios materiales en la enseñanza de la matemática. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 5, 107–114.
• Badiee, H., Babakhani, N., & Hashemian, K. (2014). The Explanation of structural model of academic achievement based on perception of classroom structure and use of motivational strategies in middle schools of Tehran. En Y. Laborda, JC; Ozdamli, F; Maasoglu (Ed.), 5TH World Conference on Educational Sciences (pp. 397–402). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.229
• Beesley, A. D., Clark, T. F., Dempsey, K., & Tweed, A. (2001). Enhancing Formative Assessment Practice and Encouraging Middle School Mathematics Engagement and Persistence. School Science and Mathematics, 118(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12255
• Breen, C., Carr, M., & Prendergast, M. (2015). Investigating the Engagement of Mature Students with Mathematics Learning Support. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 34(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru027
• Brualdi-Timmins, A. C. (1998). Classroom questions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(6).
• Carmichael, C., Muir, T., & Callingham, R. (2017). The impact of within-school autonomy on students ’ goal orientations and engagement with mathematics. Mathematical Educational Research Journal, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0200-z
• Djambong, T., & Freiman, V. (2016). Task-based assessment of students ’ computational thinking skills developed through visual programming or tangible (pp. 41–51).
• Durksen, T. L., Way, J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Motivation and engagement in mathematics : a qualitative framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematical Educational Research Journal, 29, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0199-1
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
• Frost, L. A., Hyde, J. S., & Fennema, E. (1994). Gender, mathematics performance, and mathematics-related attitudes and affect: A meta-analytic synthesis. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 373–385.
• García-Hernández, A., & González-Ramírez, T. (2017). Design and assessment of the impact of an e-textbook in the engagement towards the learning of Discrete Mathematics. En 5th International Conference Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’17) (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145443
• Goldin, G. A. (2017). Discrete Mathematics and the Affective Dimension of Mathematical Learning and Engagement. En Teaching and Learning Discrete Mathematics Worldwide: Curriculum and Research (pp. 53–65).
• Golding, C. (2014). The educational design of textbooks : a text for being interdisciplinary. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890573
• Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hodgson, T. R., Cunningham, A., Kinne, L. J., Murphy, T. J., Assessing, T. J., Hodgson, T. R., … Murphy, T. J. (2017). Assessing Behavioral Engagement in Flipped and Non-Flipped Mathematics Classrooms : Teacher Abilities and Other Potential Factors. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296538
• Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students ’ achievement in mathematics : A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment ( PISA ) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.013
• Kiwanuka, H. N., Damme, J. Van, Noortgate, W. Van Den, Anumendem, D. N., Vanlaar, G., & Reynolds, C. (2016). How do student and classroom characteristics affect attitude toward mathematics ? A multivariate multilevel analysis How do student and classroom characteristics affect attitude. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3453(June). https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123
• Kong, Q., Wong, N.-Y., & Lam, C.-C. (2003). Student Engagement in Mathematics : Development of Instrument and Validation of Construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4–21.
• Lazarides, R., & Rubach, C. (2017). Instructional characteristics in mathematics classrooms: relationships to achievement goal orientation and student engagement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 201–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0196-4
• Lee, K., & Anderson, J. (2015). Gender Differences in Mathematics Attitudes in Coeducational and Single Sex Secondary Education. En 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 357–364).
• Leon, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Ortega, M. (2018). Teaching quality: High school students’ autonomy and competence. Psicothema, 30(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.23
• Ozdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system : A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115627159
• Paterson, J., & Sneddon, J. (2011). Conversations about curriculum change: mathematical thinking and team-based learning in a discrete mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 879–889. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.613487
• Presentacion, M., Siegenthaler, R., Pinto, V., Mercader, J., & Miranda, A. (2015). Math kills and executive functioning in preschool: Clinical and ecological valuation. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.11086
• Raidah, N., & Mohd, A. (2017). Relationship Between Mathematics Statistics Engagement and Attitudes Towards Statistics Among Undergraduate Students in Malaysia. En AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 020026). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972170
• Reyes-de Cózar, S. (2016). Fortalecer la implicación y el compromiso de los estudiantes con la universidad. Una visión multidimensional del engagement. Universidad de Sevilla.
• Sillero, J., & Balmori, R. (2008). Metodología de despliegue didáctico de enseñanza activa para diferentes estilos de aprendizaje en el área de Ingeniería. In 6th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology Partnering to success: Engineering, education, research and development (pp. 1–7). Recuperado de http://www.laccei.org/LACCEI2008-Honduras/Papers/QE165_Sillero.pdf
• Skilling, K., Bobis, J., Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., & Way, J. (2016). What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0179-x
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Straber, R. (2017). Learners ’ engagement in mathematics-theories , frameworks and results. Mathematical Educational Research Journal, 29, 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0208-4
• Sunawan, Dwistia, H., Kurniawan, K., Hartati, S., & Afriyadi Sofyan. (2017). Classroom Engagement and Mathematics Achievement in Senior and Junior High School Students. En International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (Vol. 158, pp. 929–935).
• Takashiro, N. (2016). A multilevel analysis of Japanese middle school student and school socioeconomic status influence on mathematics achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9255-8
• Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (39), 342–358. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2014.08.002
• Torrano, F., & Soria, M. (2017). Diferencias de género y aprendizaje autorregulado : el efecto del rendimiento académico previo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28(4), 1027–1042.
• Villavicencio-Martínez, R.-A., & Luna-Serrano, E. (2018). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario de evaluación de la supervisión clínica. RELIEVE, 24(1). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.9672 Revista
• Waege, K. (2010). Motivation for learning mathematics in terms of needs and goals. In 6TH Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education(CERME6) (pp. 84–93).
• Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2013). Discussion Reform of Education on Course of Discrete Mathematics. En Cconference on Educational Technology and Managment Science (ICETMS 2013) (pp. 21–24).