La perspectiva post-cualitativa en la investigación educativa: genealogía, movimientos, posibilidades y tensiones

Referencias bibliográficas

• American Education Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 35–40.
• American Education Research Association. (2009). Standards for reporting on humanities oriented research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 38, 481–486.
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, D.C: Duke University of Press
• Atkinson, D. (2011). Art, Equality and Learning: Pedagogies Against the State. Rotterdam: Sage.
• Atkinson, D. (2015). The adventure of pedagogy, learning and the not-known. Subjectivity, 8(1), 43–56.
• Atkinson, D. (2018). Art, Disobedience, and Ethics. The Adventure of Pedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3), 801-31.
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Barad, K. (2010). Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come, Derrida Today. 3, 240 – 68.
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168-187, DOI 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
• Bargetz, B. (2014). Mapping Affect. Challenges of Un(timely) politics. In M. Angerer B. Bosel y M. Ott (eds). Timing of affect. Epistemologies, Aesthetics, Politics. (pp. 289 – 302). Zurich: Diaphanes..
• Berlant, Laurent (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
• Braidotti, R. (2015). Lo PosthumanoBarcelona: Gedisa.
• Brizuela, B.M., Stewart, J.P., Carrillo, R.G. y Berger, J.G. (eds.) (2000). Acts of Inquiry in Qualitative Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Educational Revie.
• Camps, V. (2011). El gobierno de las emociones. Barcelona : Herder
• Casey, K . (1995-96). The new narrative research in education. Review of research in Education, 21, 211-253.
• Clough, P. (a 2009). The new empiricism. Affect and Sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (1), 43–61.
• Clough, P. (2008). (De)Coding the Subject-in-Affect. Subjectivity, 23(1), 140-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.16
• Coleman, R. (2013). A Sensory sociology of the future: Affect, hope and inventive methodologies. The Sociological Review. 65 (3), 525 – 543.
• Coleman, R., Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press.
• Colman, F. (2010).Affective Self: Feminist Thinking and Feminist Actions” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 14 (5), 543 – 552
• Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. (2002). R. J. Shavelson y L. Towne (Eds.), Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
• Connelly, M. y Clandinin, J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19 (4), 2-14.
• Connelly, M. y Clandini, J. (2000). Narrative inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Deleuze, G. (1968/1996). Spinoza y el problema de la expresión. Barcelona: Muchnick editores.
• Cooper, K. y White, R. (2012). Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer
• Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and Criticism. Poststructural Investigation in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Clark, V. L. P., y Green, D. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.
• Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A Public Feeling. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
• Deleuze, G. (1981/2009). Spinoza: Filosofía práctica. Barcelona: Tusquets.
• Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2010). Mil Mesetas. Capitalismo y Esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pre-textos.
• Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (1993). ¿Qué es la filosofía? Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretative Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (eds). (2002). The Qualitative Inquiry Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Denzin, N. K., y Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Denzin, N.K (2010). The Qualitative Manifesto. A call to Arms. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press
• Dolphijn, R., van der Tuin, I. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Open Humanity Press. Recuperado 30 mayo 2017 desde http://openhumanitiespress.org/books/download/Dolphijn-van-der-Tuin_2013_NewMaterialism.pdf
• Dolphijn, R. y van der Tuin, I. (2013). A thousand tiny intersections: Linguisticism, Feminism, Racism and Deleuzian becomings. In A. Saldanha y J. M. Adams (eds.) Deleuze and Race (pp. 129 -– 43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,
• Ellingson, L. y Ellis, C. (2008). Autoethnography as Constructionist Project. En J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (eds.). Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 445-465). New York: The Guildford Press
• Gerrard, J., Rudolph, S. y Sriprakash, A. (2016). The Politics of Post-Qualitative Inquiry: History and Power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23 (5), 384-394.
• Greene, J. C. (2008). Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7-22.
• Greene, J. C. (2013) On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26 (6), 749-758, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
• Greco, M., y Stenner, P.(2008). Emotions: a social science reader. London: Routledge.
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge
• Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press.
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, D.C: Duke University Press
• Hernández, F. (2011). Pensar la relación pedagógica en la universidad desde el encuentro entre sujetos, deseos y saberes. En F. Hernández (ed). Pensar la relación pedagógica en la universidad desde el encuentro entre sujetos, deseos y saberes, (pp. 12-18) Barcelona: Repositorio digital de la Universitat de Barcelona.
• Hernández-Hernández, F. (2015). Introducción al seminario Investigación post-cualitativa. Programa de doctorado Artes y Educación. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona (no publicado).
• Hernández, F., y Rifà, M. (coords.) (2011). Investigación autobiográfica y cambio social. Barcelona: Octaedro.
• Hernández-Hernández, F., y Sancho, J. M. (2015). A learning process within an education research group: an approach to learning qualitative research methods International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 651-667. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1049468
• Hernández-Hernández, F., y Sancho, J. M. (2018). Historias de vida y narrativas sobre la subalternidad: Afrontar el desafío de lo inabordable de la relación con el Otro. Educar, 54(1), 15-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.913
• Hickey-Moody (en prensa). Feminist Affect: The surprise that we find in the past. London: Routledge
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2016). Femifesta for Posthuman Art Education: Visions and Becomings. In C.A. Taylor et al. (eds). Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 258 – 267).New York: Palgrave MacMillan,
• Higgins, M. (2017). Post-qualitative mo(ve)ments: Concluding remarks on methodological response-abilities and being wounded by thought. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 8(3), 89-101.
• Hinton, P., y Teusch, P. Teaching with Feminist Materialisms. Utrecht: Atgender
• Jackson, A. Y., y Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. London, New York: Routledge.
• Jonson, R. B. and A. J. Onwuegbuzie (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research
• Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), pp.14-26.
• Just, E., Grahn, W. (2017) (eds) Theories of Affect in Generic skills education: Adventurous Encounters. Cambridge Scholars Publishing
• Kincheloe, J. L., y Berry, K. (2004). Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research. Conceptualizing the bricolage. Nueva York: Open University Press.
• Kohler-Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research. Methodologies without Methodology. London: Sage.
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., Yendol-Hoppey, D., Smith, J. J., y Hayes, S. B. (2009). (E)pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 687-699.
• Lara, A. & Enciso Domínguez, G. (2013). El Giro Afectivo. Athenea Digital, 13(3), 101-119. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5565/rev/athenead/v13n3.1060
• Lara, A. & Enciso Domínguez, G. (2014). Ciencia, Teoría Social y Cuerpo en el Giro Afectivo: Esferas de Articulación. Quaderns de Psicologia, 16(2), 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1172
• Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Lather, P. (2012). The ruins of neo-liberalism and the construction of a new (scientific) subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 1021-1025.
• Lather, P. (2013) Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26:6, 634-645, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
• Lather, P., St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Introduction: Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629-633. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
• Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7 (1), 35-68.MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in postqualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658-667. doi: DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26 (6), 658-667, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
• Adrian D. Martin, A.D., y Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: qualitative educational research with political teeth, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26 (6), 668-679, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788756
• Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9-25.
• Massumi, B. (1995). The Autonomy of Affect. Cultural Critique, 31, pp. 83-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1354446 Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
• Meacham, J. (2017). The Naughty Nineties Set the Stage for Our Reality-TV Presidency, Time, September, 25, 21.
• Miñana Blasco, C. y Rodríguez, J.G. (2003). La educación en el contexto neoliberal. En Restrepo Botero, D.I. (ed). La falacia neoliberal. Crítica y alternativas. (pp. 285-321). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
• National Science Foundation (NSF). (2004). Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research. Niccolini, A. (2016) Animate affects: censorship, reckless pedagogies, and beautiful feelings, Gender and Education, 28 (2), 230-249.
• Onsès, J. (2018). Documentación visual en los fenómenos de aprendizaje con estudiantes de primaria. Una indagación rizomática difractiva desde las teorías ‘post’. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona (Tesis doctoral no publicada)
• Packwood, A. y Sikes, P. (1996). Adopting a postmodern approach to research, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9 (3), 335-345, DOI: 10.1080/0951839960090308
• Revelles-Benavente, B. (2017). Affecting feminist pedagogies: Performing critical thinking in between social networking sites and contemporary literature. In E. Just y W. Grahn (eds.) Theories of Affect in Generic skills education: Adventurous Encounters. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 131 – 150
• Revelles-Benavente, B. y González, A. M. (2019). Género en la Educación: Pedagogía y Responsabilidad Feminista en Tiempos de Crisis Política Madrid: Ediciones Morata
• Revelles-Benavente, B. (2015). Materializing feminist theory: the classroom as an act of resistance. In P. Hinton y P.Treusch (eds.) Teaching with Feminist Materialisms, (pp. 53-66) Utrecht: Atgender
• Revelles-Benavente, B. (2018). Material knowledges. Intra-acting van der Tuin’s new materialism with Barad’s agential realism. Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 60, 75-91.
• Richardson, L., y St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A Method of Inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, e Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA. : Sage Publications Ltd.
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
• Sedgwick, E. y Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry, 21(2), 496-522. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343932
• Scheurich, J.J. (2001). Research Method in the Postmodern. London, Philadelphia: Routledge y Falmer Press,
• Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry. A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
• Spinoza, B. (1667/1980). Ética demostrada según el orden geométrico. Madrid: Narcea..
• St. Pierre, E. (2011). Post Qualitative Research: The Critique and the Coming After. En N. K. Denzin e Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4a ed. Revisada), (pp. 611-625). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
• St. Pierre, E.A. (2014). A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research Toward “Post Inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing. 30, (2). Se puede acceder en : http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/viewFile/521/stpierre.pdf
• St. Pierre, E. (2016). The Empirical and the New Empiricism. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2) 111 –124
• Steier, F. (ed) (1991). Research and Reflexivity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Tashakkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Taylor, C.A. y Hughes, Ch. (eds.) (2016) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Tomkins, S. (1963). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness / Vol. II: The Negative Affects. (pp.) New York: Springer Publishing.
• Tomkins, S. (1991). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: The Negative Affects: Anger and Fear. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
• Van der Tuin, I. (2015). Generational Feminism: New Materialist Introduction to a Generative Approach. Maryland: Lexington Books
• Villanueva, P. (2017). De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de Proyecto Artístico. Derivas desde los artistas, la institución y el arte contemporáneo. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona (Tesis doctoral no publicada).
• Weyland, K. (2005). Review of rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. In H. Brady y D. Collier (Eds.), Perspectives on politics (Vol. 3, pp. 392–393). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Enciso Domínguez, G. y Lara, A. (2014). Emociones y ciencias sociales en el s. XX: La precuela del giro afectivo. Athenea Digital, 14(1), 263-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v14n1.1094