Impacto de los juegos serios en la fluidez matemáticaUn estudio en Educación Primaria

  1. Fernando Fraga Varela
  2. Esther Vila Couñago
  3. Esther Martínez Piñeiro
Journal:
Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 69

Pages: 125-135

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C69-2021-10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

In recent years there has been a renewal of educational software encouraged by the incorporation of specific designs based on serious games. Previous studies on their use do not provide conclusive data on the advancement in learning, both at a general level and in specific contents. The main objective of this work is to study the impact of the use of serious games in primary education classrooms, specifically on mathematics fluency, taking into account gamification variables and teaching experience. A quasi-experimental study was carried out with a pretest-posttest design, without a control group and with several experimental groups, involving 284 students from the first to the fourth grade. The results show a significant improvement in mathematics fluency with the use of serious games in the different grades and classroom groups studied. The gamification strategy promotes even greater progress over the classes where it has not been implemented. There is a similar time of use of serious games by both novice and experienced teachers, with better results in mathematics fluency in the case of the second group. It also shows the relationship between the results obtained and the school grades of the students. The findings point to the potential of using serious games designed specifically for school environments and challenge previous work on generational barriers in teachers.

Bibliographic References

  • Alvarez, J., & Djaouti, D. (2012). Serious games: An introduction. Éditions Questions Théoriques. http://bit.ly/3gVVAZY
  • Baroody, A.J., Bajwa, N.P., & Eiland, M. (2009). Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.45
  • Baroody, A.J., Eiland, M.D., Purpura, D.J., & Reid, E.E. (2013). Can computer-assisted discovery learning foster first graders’ fluency with the most basic addition combinations? American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 533-573. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212473349
  • Boendermaker, W.J., Veltkamp, R.C., & Peeters, M. (2017). Training behavioral control in adolescents using a serious game. Games for Health Journal, 6(6), 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0071
  • Carvalho, C.V., Rodríguez, M.C., Nistal, M.L., Hromin, M., Bianchi, A., Heidmann, O., Tsalapatas, H., & Metin, A. (2018). Using video games to promote engineering careers. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 388-399. http://bit.ly/3qjVwET
  • Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
  • Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E., & Killingsworth, S.S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates. https://bit.ly/3uE1kfh
  • Council of Chief State School Officers (Eds.) (2020). Preparing america’s students for college & career. Common core state standards initiative. http://bit.ly/2XFRaMc
  • Cozad, L. (2019). Effects of a digital mathematics fluency program on the fluency and generalization of learners. [Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. http://bit.ly/3qkbnDE
  • Cress, T. (2019). Influence of the reflex math fact fluency program on math scores. [Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University]. http://bit.ly/3sryn5x
  • Del-Moral, M., & Fernández, L.C. (2015). Videojuegos en las aulas: Implicaciones de una innovación disruptiva para desarrollar las Inteligencias Múltiples. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26, 97-118. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.44763
  • Duncan, G.J., Dowsett, C.J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A.C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L.S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
  • Fernández-Robles, J.L., Gaytán-Lugo, L.S., Hernández-Gallardo, S.C., & García-Ruíz, M.A. (2019). La alfabetización cuantitativa en estudiantes de tercer grado de primaria a través de un juego serio. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 18(1), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.18.1.131
  • Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
  • Filella, G., Pérez-Escoda, N., & Ros-Morente, A. (2017). Evaluación del programa de educación emocional ‘Happy 8-12’ para la resolución asertiva de los conflictos entre iguales. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 14(40), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.40.15164
  • Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2020). The distance learning playbook, grades K-12: Teaching for engagement and impact in any setting. Corwin Press. https://bit.ly/33wqrEG
  • Foegen, A., & Deno, S.L. (2001). Identifying growth indicators for low-achieving students in middle school mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103500102
  • Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E., & Richler, J.J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
  • Geary, D.C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539-1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
  • Gómez-García, S., Planells-de-la-Maza, A.J., & Chicharro-Merayo, M. (2016). ¿Los alumnos quieren aprender con videojuegos? Lo que opinan sus usuarios del potencial educativo de este medio. Educar, 53(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.848
  • Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025-3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  • Hieftje, K., Pendergrass, T., Kyriakides, T.C., Gilliam, W., & Fiellin, L. (2017). An evaluation of an educational video game on mathematics achievement in first grade students. Technologies, 5(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies5020030
  • Kaufman, D. (2013). Videogames in education - comparing students’, student teachers’ and master teachers opinions and experiences. In O, Foley, M.T, Restivo, J. Uhomoibhi, & M. Helfert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU (pp. 101-105). CSEDU. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004383701010105
  • Kling, G., & Bay-Williams, J.M. (2014). Assessing basic fact fluency. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(8), 488-497. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.20.8.0488
  • Lamb, R.L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040
  • Marín-Díaz, V., Morales-Díaz, M., & Reche-Urbano, E. (2019). Educational possibilities of video games in the primary education stage according to teachers in training. A case study. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.330
  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin. https://stanford.io/3xWkgaW
  • Meiri, R., Levinson, O., & Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2019). Altered association between executive functions and reading and math fluency tasks in children with reading difficulties compared with typical readers. Dyslexia, 25(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1624
  • Mellado, R., Melgarejo, B., Velasquez, C., Cubillos, C., Roncagliolo, S., & Gonzalez, N. (2018). ROLE video game tool for teaching myths and legends to school basic students. 2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705258
  • Michael, D.R., & Chen, S.L. (2006). Serious games: Games that educate, train and inform. Thomson Course Technology. https://bit.ly/3uFzQWz
  • Pérez-Manzano, A., & Almela-Baeza, J. (2018). Gamificación transmedia para la divulgación científica y el fomento de vocaciones procientíficas en adolescentes. [Gamification and transmedia for scientific promotion and for encouraging scientific careers in adolescents]. Comunicar, 55, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-09
  • Pires, A.C., González-Perilli, F., Baka?a, E., Fleisher, B., Sansone, G., & Marichal, S. (2019). Building blocks of mathematical learning: Virtual and tangible manipulatives lead to different strategies in number composition. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00081
  • Romero-Rodríguez, L., & Torres-Toukomidis, A. (2018). Con la información sí se juega: Los newsgames como narrativas inmersivas transmedias. En A. Torres-Toukomidis & L. Romero-Rodríguez (Eds.), Gamificación en Iberoamérica. Experiencias desde la comunicación y la educación. Abya-Yala. https://bit.ly/2TLCK8O
  • Rosenthal, J.A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v21n04_02
  • Sánchez-Huete, J.C. (2013). Métodos de investigación educativa. Punto Rojo. https://bit.ly/3tFYZ1X
  • Sarrell, D. (2014). The effects of reflex math as a response to intervention strategy to improve math automaticity among male and female at-risk middle school students. [Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University]. http://bit.ly/3qiFdYV
  • Stieler-Hunt, C., & Jones, C.M. (2015). Educators who believe: Understanding the enthusiasm of teachers who use digital games in the classroom. Research in Learning Technology, 23, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26155
  • Teixes, F. (2015). Gamificación: Fundamentos y aplicaciones. UOC. https://bit.ly/2SzJoEc
  • Van-der-Ven, F., Segers, E., Takashima, A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Effects of a tablet game intervention on simple addition and subtraction fluency in first graders. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.031
  • Wouters, P., van-Nimwegen, C., van-Oostendorp, H., & van-der-Spek, E.D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
  • Zagal, J.P., & Altizer, R. (2014). Examining «RPG elements»: Systems of character progression. In M. Mateas, T. Barnes, & I. Bogost (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2014, Liberty of the Seas, Caribbean, April 3-7, 2014. https://bit.ly/3oEhli9
  • Zagalo, N. (2010). Alfabetización creativa en los videojuegos: Comunicación interactiva y alfabetización cinematográfica. [Creative game literacy. A study of interactive media based on film literacy experience]. Comunicar, 35, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.3916/C35-2010-02-06