Pedagogías públicas y encuadres no representacionales en los movimientos por la libertad de circulaciónel caso de La Barraca Transfronteriza

  1. Marina Riera-Retamero 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

Journal:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Comunidades de práctica y el futuro de la educación

Issue: 33

Pages: 147-158

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Dilemata

Abstract

The present paper aims to explore the pedagogical dimensions of militant filmmaking practices in the struggles for freedom of movement, taking as study case la Barraca Transfronteriza, a communication and independent cinema initiative emerging from the No Borders network in the northern border regions of Morocco in 2017. The article explores the situated strategies that cinematic practices have historically provided within the Third World political project to the struggles against imperialism and cultural colonialism, as well as the possibilities and limitations of cinema as an apparatus of public pedagogy and its ethical and political implications. Through a perspective of the autonomy of migrations and an ontology of new materialisms, this inquiry presents a series of reflections that contribute to the discussion on the possibilities and limitations of the connections between cinematic practices and politics inscribed in contemporary migratory movements.

Bibliographic References

  • Ahmed, S. (2007). “A phenomenology of whiteness”, Feminist Theory, 8 (2), 149-168.
  • Anderson, B.; Sharma, N.; Wright, C. (2011). “Editorial: Why No Borders?”, Refuge (Special Issue on ‘No Borders as a Practical Political Project’), 26 (2), 5-18.
  • Arenas, F. (2017). “The Filmography of Guinea-Bissau’s Sana Na N’Hada: From the Return of Amílcar Cabral to the Threat of Global Drug Trafficking”. Portuguese Literary and Cultural Studies, 30, 68-94.
  • Baldi, F.; Orso, P. J. (2013). “Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra – MST – Educaçao em Movimento”. Revista HISTEDBR On-line, Campinas, 50, 275–285.
  • Barad, K. (2003). “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
  • Bassan, N. (2020). “Festivals of films, decolonial spaces and public pedagogy: some preliminary reflections”. Postcolonial directions in education, 9 (1), 88–126.
  • Binkley, S. (2018). “Biopolitical Metaphor: Habitualized Embodiment Between Discourse and Affect”. Body and Society, 24 (3), 95–124.
  • Castro, A. (2016) “El Cinefòrum de Poble Sec como «escuela» de lo común: dispositivo situado frente a modos de direccionalidad”. Artnodes. Revista de Arte, Ciencia y Tecnología, 17, 34–42.
  • César, F. (2017). in: César, F.; Hering, T.; Rito, C. (eds.) Luta Ca Caba Inda: Time Place Matter Voice,1967-2017. Berlin, Archive Books.
  • Chapman, E. (2019) The afterlife of texts in translation. Understanding the messianic in literature. Manchester, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cohen, S.; Grimsditch, H.; Hayter, T.; Hughes, B. y Landau, D. (2003). “Appendix: Manifesto of the No One Is Illegal Group, September 2003”. In: Hayter, T. (2004) Open Borders. London, Pluto Press.
  • Deleuze, G.; Foucault, M. (1972). “Intellectuals and power. A conversation between Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault” in Bouchard, D. (Ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. New York, Cornell University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2. L’Image-temps. Paris, Minuit.
  • Derrida, J. (1996). Le monolinguisme de l’autre ou La prothèse d’origine. París, Galilée.
  • Eshun, K; Gray, R. (2011). “The Militant Image. A Ciné-Geography Editors’ Introduction”. Third Text, 25 (1), 1–12.
  • Fullagar, S.; O’Brien, W.; Pavlidis, A. (2019) Feminism and a Vital Politics of Depression and Recovery. Southport: Palgrave Macmillan, Griffith University.
  • Garelli, G.; Tazzioli, M.; Mezzadra, S.; Kasparek, B. y Peano, I. (2015). “Militant investigation”. En: Casas-Cortes, M.; Cobarrubias, S.; De Genova, N.; Garelli, G.; Grappi, G.; Heller, C.; Hess, S.; Kasparek, B.; Mezzadra, S.; Neilson, B.; Peano, I.; Pezzani, L.; Pickles, J.; Rahola, F.; Riedner, L.; Scheel, S.; Tazzioli, M. (2015) “New Keywords: Migration and Borders”, Cultural Studies, 29 (1), 55-87.
  • Getino, O. y Solanas, F. (1969). Hacia un tercer cine: Apuntes y experiencias para el desarrollo de un cine de liberación en el tercer mundo.
  • Giroux, H. A. (2004). “Cultural Studies, Public Pedagogy, and the Responsibility of Intellectuals”. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1 (1), 59–79.
  • Glissant, E. (2009). One world in relation / Entrevistado por Manthia Diawara. En: Diawara, M. (director). (2009) Edouard Glissant: One world in relation [documental]. France, K’a Yéléma Productions.
  • Graeber, D. (2009). Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, AK Pr Distribution.
  • Hayter, T. (2004) Open Borders. London, Pluto Press.
  • Hinton, P. (2013). “The Quantum Dance and the World’s ‘Extraordinary Liveliness’: Refiguring Corporeal Ethics in Karen Barad’s Agential Realism”. Somatechnics, 3 (1), 169–189.
  • Jackson, A. Y. (2003). “Rhizovocality”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 16 (5), 693-710.
  • Mestman, M. (2016). “Argel, Buenos Aires, Montreal: El Comité de Cine del Tercer Mundo (1973/1974)”. Secuencias. Revista de historia del cine, 43–44 (1), 73–93.
  • Mezzadra, S. (2005). Derecho de fuga. Migraciones, ciudadanía y globalización. Madrid, Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Mezzadra, S. (2012). “Capitalismo, migraciones y luchas sociales. La mirada de la autonomía”. NUSO – Nueva Sociedad, 237, 159–178.
  • Mezzadra, S. (2017). La frontera como método o la multiplicación del trabajo. Madrid, Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Nichols, B. (1997). La representación de la realidad: cuestiones y conceptos sobre el documental. Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Papadopoulos, D.; Stephenson, N. y Tsianos, V. (2008). Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the 21st Century. London, Pluto Press.
  • Quine, W. (2013). Word and object. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  • Rancière, J. (2011). El malestar de la estética. Buenos Aires, Capital Intelectual.
  • Rancière, J. (2010). El espectador emancipado. Buenos Aires, Ediciones Manantial.
  • Rancière, J. (2005). La fábula cinematográfica: reflexiones sobre la ficción en el cine. Madrid, Grupo Planeta.
  • Rancière, J. (1996). El desacuerdo. Política y filosofía. Buenos Aires, Ediciones Nueva Visión.
  • Rancière, J. (2019). En: Rancière, J. y Bassas, J. (2019). El litigio de las palabras. Diálogo sobre la política del lenguaje. Barcelona,Ned Ediciones.
  • Richardson, L.; St. Pierre, E. (2017). “Writing as a method of Inquiry” in Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publishing, California.
  • Spivak, G. (2010). Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. Edited by Rosalin C. Morris. New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Stam, R. (2004). “Beyond Third Cinema. Aesthetics of Hybridity” in Guneratne, A. R. & Dissanayake, W. (Eds.) Rethinking Third Cinema. New York, Routledge.
  • St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New Empiricisms and New Materialisms: Conditions for New Inquiry. Cultural Studies & Critical Methodologies, 16 (2), 99–110.
  • Walters, W. (2002). “Mapping Schengenland: Denaturalizing the Border”, in Environment and Planning D.Society and Space, 20 (5), 561–580.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. y Van Dijk, T.A. (2007). Introducción: inmigración y discurso. En R. Zapata-Barrero y T.A. Van Dijk (Eds.), Discursos sobre la inmigración en España: Los medios de comunicación, los parlamentos y las administraciones, 9-14. Barcelona, CIDOB.
Data source: Dialnet