Immigrant students’ knowledge and experiences around the schoola relational, child-centred approach

  1. Juana María Sancho Gil
  2. Sandra Soler Campo
  3. María Domingo Coscollola
  4. Fernando Hernández
Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

ISSN: 1135-6405

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 33

Issue: 4

Pages: 677-701

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2021.1975455 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR


This article is part of the European project MiCREATE, whose purpose is to investigate the reception of immigrant minors in educational systems and society from a child-centred approach. This text builds on one of the phases in the project in which three case studies were conducted in three primary schools in Barcelona. It focuses on the activities of 75 children aged 11–12 at these schools, who were questioned about the notion of ‘voice’ and ‘giving voice’ as the epistemic and ethical referents of this perspective, adopting a decolonizing position. Using the participants’ contributions through artistic methods, they reveal their knowledge and experiences on three particularly significant dimensions in their lives inside and outside school: socialization, care and interaction, and play. These contributions are compared to other studies, suggesting the need for perspectives that avoid imposing views on children in research and education.

Bibliographic References

  • Abio, G. (2013). Incidentes críticos (significativos) y rejillas de observación como apoyo para la observación de clases y reflexión de profesores de lengua española en formación. In Actas del XXI Seminario de Dificultades Específicas para la Enseñanza del Español a Lusohablantes - El profesor de ELE en Brasil (pp. 107–124). [Google Scholar]
  • Acosta, L. C. (2015). Migration and its impact on children’s lives: A literature review [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Iceland. [Google Scholar]
  • Antunes-Ornelas, M. S. (2016). O papel da autoria dos jovens na relação entre o museu de arte contemporânea e a escola [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Barcelona. [Google Scholar]
  • Assink, M., & Schroots, J. J. (2010). The dynamics of autobiographical memory: Using the LIM| Life-line interview method. Hogrefe Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. SAGE Publications Ltd. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Bhana, D. (2016). Childhood sexuality and AIDS education. The price of innocence. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Black, A. L., & Busch, G. (2016). Understanding and influencing research with children. In B. Harreveld, M. Danaher, C. Lawson, B. A. Knight, & G. Busch (Eds.), Constructing methodology for qualitative research (pp. 219–235). Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Calvo, A., Haya, I., & Susinos, T. (2012). El rol del orientador en la mejora escolar. Una investigación centrada en la voz del alumnado como elemento de cambio. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 10(2), 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Cannella, G. S., & Viruru, R. (2004). Childhood and postcolonization: Power, education, and contemporary practice. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Chung, S., & Walsh, D. (2000). Unpacking child-centredness: A history of meanings. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 215–234. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • Dawani, S., & Loots, G. (2015). Doing research together: Creating spaces of collaboration with young people using visual methods. Visual Methodologies, 3(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Delgado, M. (2003). Naturalismo y realismo en etnografía urbana. Cuestiones metodológicas para una antropología de las calles. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 39(2), 7–39. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Demintseva, E. (2020). ‘Migrant schools’ and the ‘children of migrants’: Constructing boundaries around and inside school space. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(4), 598–612. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88. [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Douglas, J. (1985). Creative Interviewing. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Ebrahim, H. (2010). Situated ethics: Possibilities for young children as research participants in the South African context. Early Child Development and Care, 180(3), 289–298. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
  • Elosua, P. (2019). Performance factors and immigration. Impact of individual and school variables/Factores de rendimiento e inmigración. Impacto de variables individuales y escolares. Cultura y Educación, 31(1), 1–30. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Essomba, M. A. (2012). Inmigración, sociedad y educación en la UE. Hacia una política educativa de plena inclusión. Cultura y Educación, 24(2), 137–148. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When children are asked about their well-being: Towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57–77. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Feldman, A. (1999). The role of conversation in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 7(1), 125–147. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
  • Fielding, M. (2011). La voz del alumnado y la inclusión educativa: una aproximación democrática radical para el aprendizaje intergeneracional. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 25(1), 31–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Singer, D., & Berk, L. E. (2010). Playing around in school: Implications for learning and educational policy. In A. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of play (pp. 341–363). Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  • GESOP. (2018). BREU DE DADES (32): La població escolar: de P3 a 4t d’ESO. [Google Scholar]
  • Goncu, A., & Gaskins, S. (Eds.). (2007). Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives. Psychology Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández, F. (2007). Narrativas en torno a las subjetividades en la escuela primaria. Perspectiva, 25(1), 171–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández, F. (2011). Investigar con los jóvenes: cuestiones temáticas, metodológicas, éticas y educativas. Universidad de Barcelona. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández-Hernández, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2018). Writing and managing multimodal field notes. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • IDESCAT. (2020). Población extranjera a 1 de enero. Por sexo y grupos de edad. [Google Scholar]
  • Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen, M. H., Drake, M. S., & Petersen, A. (2014). Imaginative methodologies in the social sciences, creativity, poetics and rhetoric in social research. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Policy Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Kohm, L. M. (2007). Tracing the foundations of the best interests of the child standard in American jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 10, 337–376. [Google Scholar]
  • Luedtke, A. (2020). Migrants and minorities: the European response. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Madison, D. (2005). Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics and performance. SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayeza, E. (2017). Doing child-centered ethnography: Unravelling the complexities of reducing the perceptions of adult male power during fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917714162. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. (2018). Datos y cifras. Curso escolar 2018/2019. Secretaría General Técnica. Centro de Publicaciones. [Google Scholar]
  • Monereo, C., & Monte, C. (2011). Docentes en tránsito. Análisis de incidentes en secundaria. Graó. [Google Scholar]
  • Nind, M. (2014). What in inclusive research? Bloomsbury Publishing. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Romm, N. R. A. (2020). Reflections on a post-qualitative inquiry with children/young people: Exploring and furthering a performative research ethics [77 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1), Art. 6. [Google Scholar]
  • Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2007). Cómo mejorar tu centro escolar dando la voz al alumnado. Morata. [Google Scholar]
  • Rushton, S., Juola-Rushton, A., & Larkin, E. (2010). Neuroscience, play and early childhood education: Connections, implications and assessment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 351–361. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Sancho, J. M., Hernández, F., Herraiz, F., Padilla, P., Fendler, R., Arrazola, J., Giró, X., & Valenzuela, R. (2012). Memòria del projecte: Trajectòries d’èxit de joves immigrants a l’ensenyament superior i al món professional. Universitat de Barcelona. Dipòsit Digital. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneeweis, N. (2011). Educational institutions and the integration of migrants. Journal of Population Economics, 24(4), 1281–1308. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Smith, E. F., Gidlow, B., & Steel, G. (2012). Engaging adolescent participants in academic research: The use of photo-elicitation interviews to evaluate school-based outdoor education programmes. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 367–387. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2012). From silent witnesses to active agents: Student voice in re-engaging with learning. Adolescent cultures, school, and society (Vol. 55). Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2013). Whose side are you on? Advocacy ethnography: Some methodological aspects of narrative portraits of disadvantaged young people, in socially critical research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(1), 1–20. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
  • St. Pierre, E. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricism. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Stuardo-Concha, M., Carrasco, S., & Hernández-Hernández, F. (2021). Possibilities, difficulties, tensions, and risks in child-centered approach in educational research. In B. Gornik, F. Hernández-Hernández, J. M. Sancho-Gil, & M. Sedmak (Eds.), Migrant children’s integration and education in Europe approaches, methodologies and policies (pp. 97–116). Octaedro. [Google Scholar]
  • Susinos, T. (2009). Escuchar para compartir. Reconociendo la autoridad del alumnado en el proyecto de una escuela inclusiva. Revista de Educación, 349, 119–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Susinos, T., & Ceballos, N. (2012). Voz del alumnado y presencia participativa en la vida escolar. Apuntes para una cartografía de la voz del alumnado en la mejora educativa. Revista de Educación, 359, 24–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Susinos, T., & Parrilla, Á. (2013). Investigación inclusiva en tiempos difíciles: Certezas provisionales y debates pendientes. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 11(2), 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Warner-Søderholm, G., & Krige, M. (2014). The art of dealing with religious and cultural diversity in the classroom. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(10), 149–160. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Wentzel, K. R., & Looney, L. (2007). Socialization in school settings. In J. Grusec, & P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of social development (pp. 382–403). Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  • Zapata-Barrero, R., & de Witte, N. (2007). Spanish approaches to the management of cultural diversity in compulsory education. Grup de Recerca sobre Immigració i Innovació Política (GRIIP). [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang-Yu, C. (2020, September). Sobre el fracàs escolar del model intercultural català. Crític. [Google Scholar]