Las tecnologías como elemento mediador de procesos de auto inclusión digital de mujeres rurales

  1. María Caridad Sierra Daza
  2. María Rosa Fernández Sánchez
Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

ISSN: 1133-8482

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 64

Pages: 55-78

Type: Article

More publications in: Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación


Cited by

  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 1 (03-03-2024)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2022
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.629
  • Best Quartile: Q2
  • Area: Computer Networks and Communications Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 137/373
  • Area: Information Systems Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 138/376
  • Area: Computer Science Applications Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 303/782
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 394/1438

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2022
  • Journal Impact: 1.780
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 13/232


  • Social Sciences: B
  • Human Sciences: C

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2022
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 5.6
  • Area: Education Percentile: 88
  • Area: Computer Science Applications Percentile: 71
  • Area: Information Systems Percentile: 71
  • Area: Computer Networks and Communications Percentile: 70

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2022
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 1.34
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 139/759


This article includes an investigation on the process of digital self-inclusion of women from rural areas of Extremadura. The main objective is to identify the facilitators of inclusion of rural women in digital technologies, addressing the self-definition of the level of autonomy in the management of these media and the existence of differences in the perception of these facilitators based on age. To do this, we start from a quantitative approach anda descriptive methodology by applying the SIRWOP Questionnaire to a random sample of 400 women (between 15 and 75 years old) from rural settings located in the province of Cáceres. The results obtained reveal different levels of autonomy where young womenwith more education and income present better technological performance. Also, differences are observed in the assessment of enablers for the use of technologies, so young women have greater support from the environment. In general, there is a positive perception about the facilitating aspects of digital inclusion, highlighting the support of family members and better access to technologies. To conclude, guidelines are offered aimed at promoting measures focused on the development of advanced digital skills and routine uses

Bibliographic References

  • Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S. D., & Upadhyay, P. (2020). Technology adoption and entrepreneurial orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120-236.
  • Chetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: Skills for the new age. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12, 1-20.
  • Del Prete, A., Gisbert, M., & Camacho, M. M. (2013). Las TIC como herramienta de empoderamiento para el colectivo de mujeres mayores: El caso de la comarca del Montsià (Cataluña). Píxel-Bit, 43, 37-50.
  • Díez-Gutiérrez, E., & Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2018). Ubiquitous learning ecologies for a critical cyber-citizenship. Comunicar, 54, 49-58.
  • Fernández, M. R. (2015). Las TIC en el proceso socioeducativo de la mujer rural en Extremadura. En J. A. Pérez Rubio, M. Sánchez-Oro, & Y. García García (Eds.), Mujer rural en Extremadura: Proceso de empoderamiento y aportaciones al capital social (pp. 275-300). Universidad de Extremadura.
  • Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New, Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331.
  • García Aguilera, F. J., Leiva Olivencia, J., Espíndola Fontoura Junior, E., & Piccoli Fontoura, F. A. (2021). Inclusión social de mujeres rurales a través de programas de alfabetización digital para el empleo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(1), 15-25.
  • González-Ramos, A. M., Vergés-Bosch, N., & Martínez-García, J. S. (2017). Women in the technology labour market. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 159(17), 73-89.
  • Jiménez-Cortés, R. (2016). Ciudadanía digital y bienestar de las mujeres rurales en las redes sociales. RELATEC, 15(2), 81-94.
  • Jiménez-Cortés, R. (2019). Aprendizaje de las mujeres en las redes sociales: Validación de la escala MAIA con PLS. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(2), 431-449.
  • Jiménez-Cortés, R., Rebollo-Catalán, M. A., García-Pérez, R., & Buzón-García, O. (2015). Social network user motivation: An analysis of rural women’s profiles. RELIEVE, 21(1), 1-16.
  • Jiménez-Cortés, R., Vico-Bosch, A., & Rebollo-Catalán, A. (2017). Female university student’s ICT learning strategies and their influence on digital competence. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-10.
  • Kuo, F. Y., Tseng, F. C., Lin, C. I., & Tang, W. H. (2013). Critical success factors for motivating and sustaining women’s ICT learning. Computers & Education, 67, 208-218.
  • Lwoga, E. T., & Chigona, W. (2019). Perception, usage and barriers towards the utilisation of the telecentre among rural women in Tanzania. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(1), 2-16.
  • Martínez-Rodríguez, D. C., & Benítez-Corona, L. (2020). The ecology of resilience learning in ubiquitous environments to adverse situations. Comunicar, 62, 43-52.
  • Mayor-Buzón, V., García-Pérez, R., & Rebollo-Catalán, M. A. (2019). Exploring factors predicting digital competence in social networking sites. Píxel-Bit, 56, 51-69.
  • Mivehchi, L. (2019). The role of information technology in women entrepreneurship (the case of e-retailing in Iran). Procedia Computer Science, 158, 508-512.
  • Novo-Corti, I., Varela-Candamio, L., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2014). Breaking the walls of social exclusion of women rural by means of ICTs: The case of ‘digital divides’ in Galician. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 497-507.
  • Pirhonen, J., Lolich, L., Tuominen, K., Jolanki, O., & Timonen, V. (2020). These devices have not been made for older people's needs. Older adults' perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. Technology in Society, 62, 1-9.
  • Rebollo-Catalán, M. A., & Vico-Bosch, A. (2014). Perceived social support as a factor of rural women´s digital inclusion in online social networks. Comunicar, 22(43), 173-180.
  • Rebollo-Catalán, A., Vico-Bosch A., & García, R. (2016). El Aprendizaje de las mujeres de las redes sociales y su incidencia en la competencia digital. Revista Prisma Social, 15, 122-146.
  • Rodrigo, C., & Tabuenca, B. (2020). Learning ecologies in online students with disabilities. Comunicar, 28(62), 53-65.
  • Rodríguez-Díaz, M. R., & Jiménez-Cortés, R. (2020). Inclusión digital de las mujeres en las políticas españolas de la sociedad de la información. Athenea Digital, 20(2), 1-26.
  • Rodríguez-Zidan, E., Cabrera-Borges, C., & Zorrilla-Salgador, J. P. (2019). Estudio cualitativo acerca de las ecologías del aprendizaje ubicuo. International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies, 6(1), 53-68.
  • Rouhani, L. (2019). Using digital storytelling as a source of empowerment for rural women in Benin. Gender & Development, 27(3), 573-586.
  • Sánchez-Muros, S. P., & Jiménez Rodrigo, M. L. (2013). Mujeres rurales y participación social: Análisis del asociacionismo femenino en la provincia de Granada (España). Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10(72), 223-242.
  • Sánchez-Oro, M., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2017). Digital technologies and rural women's entrepreneurship. Revista Prisma Social, 18, 259-277.
  • Sangrà, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Veletsianos, G. (2019). Lifelong learning ecologies: Linking formal and informal contexts of learning in the digital era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1615-1618.
  • Shamburg, C. (2020). Rising waves in informal education: Women of color with educationally oriented podcasts. Education and Information Technologies, 0, 1-15.
  • Sobieraj, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2020). Similarities and differences between genders in the usage of computer with different levels of technological complexity. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106-145.
  • Soria-Guzmán, M. I. (2021). Mujeres hacker, saber-hacer y código abierto: Tejiendo el sueño hackfeminista. Liminar, 19(1), 57-74.
  • Summers, K. H., Baird, T. D., Woodhouse, E., Christie, M. E., McCabe, J. T., Terta, F., & Peter, N. (2020). Mobile phones and women's empowerment in Maasai communities: How men shape women's social relations and access to phones. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 126-137.
  • Suwana, F. (2017). Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 212-217.
  • Thompson, K. M., & Paul, A. (2020). Factors of digital inclusion among women: Revisiting India and extending to Chile and Australia for additional analysis. The Library Quarterly, 90(2), 173-188.
  • Verges, N. (2012). De la exclusión a la autoinclusión de las mujeres en las TIC. Motivaciones, posibilitadores y mecanismos de autoinclusión. Athenea Digital, 12(3), 129-150.
  • Vernia-Carrasco, A. M. (2021). Música y tecnología contra el Covid-19: Un caso en personas mayores. Revista Prisma Social, 32, 244-261.
  • Vico-Bosch, A., & Rebollo-Catalán, A. (2018). Incidencia de las políticas de inclusión digital en el uso de las redes sociales de mujeres de entorno rural. Revista Prisma Social, 21, 263-281.
  • Vico-Bosch, A., & Rebollo-Catalán, A. (2019). El aprendizaje de las mujeres sobre internet y redes sociales: Validación y resultados generales de una escala. Educación XX1, 22(1), 375-400.
  • Virtanen, M. A., Haavisto, E., Liikanen, E., & Kääriäinen, M. (2018). Ubiquitous learning environments in higher education: A scoping literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 985-998.
  • Yu, H., & Cui, L. (2019). China's E-commerce: Empowering rural women? The China Quarterly, 238, 418-437.
  • Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2021). Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Information and Organization, 31(1), 1-6.