El desarrollo profesional a través de las prácticas externas desde la visión del profesorado en formación inicial

  1. Irene García-Lázaro
  2. Jesús Conde-Jiménez
  3. María Pilar Colás-Bravo
Revista:
Revista Fuentes

ISSN: 1575-7072,  2172-7775

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 24

Volumen: 2

Páginas: 149-161

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Fuentes

Resumen

El desarrollo profesional del futuro profesorado se presenta a través de experiencias de prácticas externas como parte de la formación inicial docente. Éstas se han visto influidas por el surgimiento de la pandemia recientemente, así, poco es sabido acercade cómo el desempeño profesional y la tutorización de prácticas se han visto afectados. Por ello, este estudio analiza las percepciones de nueve docentes en formación inicial de la Universidad Loyola Andalucía sobre su desarrollo profesional en prácticas ante la pandemia. Se aplica un diseño cualitativo de casos múltiple que explora el desempeño profesional y las relaciones de tutorización sucedidos en prácticas siendo dimensiones moduladoras del proceso formativo. La recogida de información se realiza mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas (antes y después de las prácticas) y un grupo focal (durante las prácticas). Se utiliza el software cualitativo Atlas.ti para analizar la información desde un enfoque inductivo-deductivo. Los hallazgos muestran que los participantes esperaban fortalecer el desempeño mediante la mejora de estrategias docentes y de su identidad profesional. Asimismo, esperaban una relación de tutorización debilitada por la COVID-19. Tras las prácticas, el impacto de la pandemia no parece significativo ni en el desempeño ni en la tutorización, siendo ésta considerada un eje reflexivo. Las conclusiones del estudio proponen, primero, reflexionar sobre aspectos verdaderamente afectados por situaciones impredecibles e inestables durante las prácticas, como la pandemia y, segundo, repensar los pilares del desarrollo profesional en estos contextos, como el desempeño y las relaciones de tutorización.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Avidov-Ungar, O. (2016). A model of professional development: teachers’ perceptions of their professional development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(6), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1158955
  • Badilla, I., Ramírez, A., Rizo, L. y Rojas, K. (2014). Estrategias didácticas para promover la auto-reflexión de la praxis en los procesos de formación docente. Revista Electrónica Educare, 18(2), 209-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.18-2.11
  • Becker, E. S., Waldis, M., & Staub, F. C. (2019). Advancing student teachers’ learning in the teaching practicum through Content-Focused Coaching: A field experiment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.007
  • Clarke, A. (1995). Professional Development in Practicum Settings: Reflective Practice Under Scrutiny. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00028-5
  • Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating Teacher Participation in Teacher Education: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499618
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  • Dewey, J. (1998). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  • Farhadiba, D., & Nunuk Wulyani, A. (2020). Investigating Preservice Teachers’ Efficacy Level and Factors Influencing It. KnE Social Sciences, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i4.6464
  • Flores, M. A. (2020). Preparing teachers to teach in complex settings: opportunities for professional learning and development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1771895
  • Flores, M. A. & Gago, M. (2020) Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709
  • Fox, A., Wilson, E., & Deaney, R. (2011). Beginning Teachers’ Workplace Experiences: Perceptions of and Use of Support. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9046-1
  • Gorichon-Gálvez, S., Pérez Lorca, A., Yañez-Pérez, M., & Roberts-Rivera, M. (2020). Supervisión y acompañamiento de prácticas profesionales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 82(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8213682
  • Hallberg, L. R. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399
  • Henry, A. (2016). Conceptualizing Teacher Identity as a Complex Dynamic System: The Inner Dynamics of Transformations During a Practicum. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116655382
  • Hordvik, M., Fletcher, T., Haugen, A., Engebretsen, B. & Møller, L. (2021). Using the metaphor of orchestration to make sense of facilitating teacher educator professional development, European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1946510
  • Izadinia, M. (2015). A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.08.003
  • Izadinia, M. (2016). Preservice teachers’ professional identity development and the role of mentor teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2016-0004
  • Kaldi, S., & Xafakos. E. (2017). Student teachers' school teaching practice: The relation amongst perceived self-competence, motivation and sources of support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.019
  • Kartal, G. & Demir, Y. (2021). Observational narrative knowledging in early professional development of student teachers of English. Instructional Science, 49, 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09532-3
  • Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
  • König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
  • Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
  • Mena, L. (2018). La muestra cualitativa en la práctica: una propuesta. Revista Eixo, 7(3), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.19123/eixo.v8i3.646
  • Mena-Marcos, J., García-Rodríguez, M. L., & Tillema, H. (2013). Student teacher reflective writing: What does it reveal? European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.713933
  • Nel, C., & Marais, E. (2021). Addressing the wicked problem of feedback during the teaching practicum. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.25
  • Palomares, A., & Alarcón, M. del C. (2018). El tutor de prácticas y su influencia en la formación de profesionales en los Grados de Educación. Revista Practicum, 3(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8273
  • Richards, K. A. R, Hemphill, M. A. & Templin, T. J. (2018). Personal and contextual factors related to teachers’ experience with stress and burnout. Teachers and Teaching, 24(7), 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1476337
  • Rodríguez, R. S., Pedrajas, A. P., & Gracia, E. P. (2019). Beliefs on the teacher professionalism and teaching models in initial teacher education. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 24, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782019240018
  • Rodríguez-Gómez, D., Armengol, C., & Meneses, J. (2017). La adquisición de las competencias profesionales a través de las prácticas curriculares de la formación inicial de maestros. Revista de Educación, (376), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-376-350
  • Saban, A. (2006). Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay. Teaching Education, 17(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601017386
  • Saiz-Linares, Á., & Ceballos-López, N. (2020). Análisis multifocal en la formación inicial de docentes: interpretaciones de alumnado y supervisores. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 25, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782019250005
  • Sasaki, R., Goff, W., Dowsett, A., Parossien, D., Matthies, J., Di Iorio, C., Montey, S., Rowe, S., & Puddy, G. (2020). The Practicum Experience during Covid-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 329–339. https://bit.ly/3pb6zmx
  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  • Seban, D. (2015). Development of preservice identities: learning from a multigrade classroom practicum context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.992632
  • Son, J., & Lee, M. Y. (2020). Exploring the Relationship Between Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of Problem Solving and Their Problem-Solving Performances. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10045-w
  • Stake, R. E. (2005). Investigación con estudio de casos. Morata.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.
  • Theelen, H., Willems, M. van den Beemt, A. Conijin, R y den Brok, P. (2020). Virtual internships in blended environments to prepare preservice teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12760
  • Trujillo-Sáez, F., Fernández-Navas, M., Montes-Rodríguez, M., Segura-Robles, A., Alaminos-Romero, F.J. y Postigo-Fuentes, A.Y. (2020). Panorama de la educación en España tras la pandemia de COVID-19: la opinión de la comunidad educativa. FAD. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo-3878844
  • UNESCO. (2020). Apoyar a los docentes y al personal educativo en tiempos de crisis. Respuesta educativa de la UNESCO a la COVID-19. https://bit.ly/3b11V28
  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
  • Yahiji, K., Otaya, L. G., & Anwar, H. (2019). Assessment model of student field practice at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Training in Indonesia: A reality and expectation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12117a
  • Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. SAGE.
  • Yuan, R., Liu, W., & Lee, I. (2019). Confrontation, negotiation and agency: exploring the inner dynamics of student teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(8), 972–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1688286
  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
  • Zhu, G., Mena, J. & Johson, C. (2020). Chinese student teachers’ teaching practicum experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101638
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet