Mediation Models Predicting the Level of Digital Competence of 12-14 Year Old Schoolchildren in the Area of Digital Problem Solving

  1. Marcos Cabezas González 1
  2. Sonia Casillas Martín 1
  3. Ana García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 11

Issue: 2

Pages: 168-185

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2022.7.789 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Abstract

Technology has become invaluable and digital competence has turned into a necessity for students. The research presented here aims to propose mediation models that explain the influence of attitudinal, technology use, and family factors on the level of digital problem-solving skills of compulsory education students (12-14 years old). A quantitative methodology with a cross-sectional design was used. We worked with a sample of 772 students from 18 Spanish educational centres according to a stratified random sampling method. For data collection, an objective assessment test was used for knowledge and skills, and a Likert scale for attitudes. Regression analyses were carried out by creating theoretical reference models based on the bootstrapping technique. The results showed that students who expressed a favourable attitude towards digital problem solving demonstrated a better level of competence, which was also positively influenced by the possession of technological devices and the frequency of their use for school and non-school activities at home.

Funding information

Bibliographic References

  • Albitres, J., Salinas, L., Bazan, R., Herrera, H., & Agüero, J. (2021). Attitude towards the use of Information and Communication Technologies for teaching university professors in the context of COVID-19. Revista Innova Educación, 3(2), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2021.02.00
  • Almerich, G., Díaz-García, I., Cebrián-Cifuentes, S., & Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M. (2018). Dimensional structure of 21st century competences in university students of education. RELIEVE, 24(2), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12548
  • Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Díaz-García, I., & Orellana, N. (2020). Structure of 21st century competences in students in the sphere of education. influential personal factors. RELIEVE, 24(1), 45–74. http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12548
  • Arango, D. A. G., Villarreal, J. E., Cuéllar, Ó. A., Echeverri, C. A., Henao, C. F., & Botero, M. A. (2020). Digital competence in university teachers: Evaluation of relation between attitude, training and digital literacy in the use of ICT in educational environments. RISTI, E29, 538–552. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3eJ3lzM
  • Basantes-Andrade, A. V., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2020). Digital Competences Relationship between Gender and Generation of University Professors. IJASEIT, 10(1), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.1.10806
  • Basilotta, V., García-Valcárcel, A., Casillas-Martín, S., & Cabezas-González, M. (2020). Evaluation of information literacy skills in students and a study of several influential variables. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.65835
  • Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Ke, F. (2017). The relationship among pre-service teachers' computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance. IJTEL, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.10003119
  • Björn, M., & Svensson, I. (2021). Exploring an intervention’s impact on everyday school activities. SfL, 36(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12336
  • Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889
  • Bunting, L., Segerstad, Y. H., & Barendregt, W. (2021). Swedish teachers’ views on the use of personalised learning technologies for teaching children reading in the English classroom. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 27, 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100236
  • Cabanillas García, J. L., Luengo González, R., & Torres Carvalho, J. L. (2019). Differences of attitude concerning ict of professional training in presential and virtual environments (Plan @vanza) Pixel Bit, 55, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i55.03
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Metareflexion on digital teaching competence: Competence frameworks’ analysis. Revista Panorâmica, 32, 32–48. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2RfdOe9
  • Cabezas-González, M., Casillas-Martín, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). The digital competence of pre-service educators: influence of personal variables. Sustainability, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042318
  • Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1. The digital competence framework for citizens. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
  • Casillas-Martín, S., & Cabezas-González, M. (2019). Are early childhood education teachers prepared for educating in the network society? Opción, 35(89), 1317–1348. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/27528
  • Casillas-Martín, S., Cabezas-González, M., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2020). Psychometric analysis of a test to assess the digital competence of compulsory education students. Relieve, 26(2). http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.2.17611
  • Chaudron, S., Gioia, R. D., & Gemo, M. (2018). Young children (0-8) and digital technology: A qualitative study across Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/245671
  • Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2020). ICT-related behavioral factors mediate the relationship between adolescents’ ICT interest and their ICT self-efficacy: Evidence from 30 countries. Computers & Education, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104004
  • Colás, P., Conde, J., & Reyes, S. (2017). Digital competences of non-university students. RELATEC, 16(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.16.1.7
  • European Union (2018). Recomendación C 189 Relativa a las Competencias Clave Para el Aprendizaje Permanente. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3r8w4Dp
  • Ferrari, A. (2013). A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
  • García-Martín, S., & Cantón-Mayo, I. (2019). Use of technologies and academic performance in adolescent students. Comunicar, 59(27), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-07
  • García-Valcárcel, A., Casillas-Martín, S., & Basilotta, V. (2020). Validation of an Indicator Model (INCODIES) for Assessing Student Digital Competence in Basic Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.1.459
  • García-Valcárcel, A., Hernández-Martín, A., Mena-Marcos, J. J., Iglesias-Rodríguez, A., Casillas-Martín, S., Cabezas-González, M., ... Basilotta, V. (2019a). Modelo de indicadores para evaluar la competencia digital de los estudiantes tomando como referencia el modelo DIGCOMP (INCODIES). Retrieved from https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/139409
  • García-Valcárcel, A., Hernández-Martín, A., Mena-Marcos, J. J., Iglesias-Rodríguez, A., Casillas-Martín, S., Cabezas-González, M., ... V, B. (2019b). Prueba para evaluar la competencia digital de los estudiantes tomando como referencia el modelo DigComp (ECODIES): área de resolución de problemas. Retrieved from https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/140242
  • George-Reyes, C. E., & Avello-Martínez, R. (2021). Digital literacy in education. Systematic review of scientific production in Scopus. RED, 21(66). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.444751
  • Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M., & Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-scale Assess Educ, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, T., Ringle, C. M., & Starsted, M. (2017). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37(19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., López-Aguado, M., Manso-Ayuso, J., & Fernández-Río, J. (2020). Families and Teachers: Guarantees of Learning during Confinement. RIEJS, 9(3e), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.019
  • INE. (2020). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares. Año 2020. (Vol. 2020). Retrieved from https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176741&menu=resultados&idp=1254735976608
  • ISEP. (2020). Adicciones tecnológicas: internet, móviles y redes sociales. Retrieved from https://www.isep.es/actualidad-psicologia-clinica/adicciones-tecnologicas-internet-moviles-y-redes-sociales/
  • Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. D. (2018). The relationships of family, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility in sustainable student engagement in higher education. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su101246
  • Li, X., & Wah-Chu, S. K. (2020). Exploring the effects of gamification pedagogy on children’s reading: A mixed-method study on academic performance, reading-related mentality and behaviors, and sustainability. BJET, 52(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13057
  • Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052
  • Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children's initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15582095
  • Miranda, R., Oriol, X., Amutio, A., & Ortúzar, H. (2019). Adolescent Bullying Victimization and Life Satisfaction: Can Family and School Adult Support Figures Mitigate this Effect? Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.07.001
  • Montenegro, S., Raya, E., & Navaridas, F. (2020). Teacher’s Perceptions of the Effects of the Digital Divide in Basic Education during the Covid-19. RIEJS, 9(e3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.017
  • Müller, M., & Varga, M. (2020). Digital competences or teachers and associates at higher educational institutions in the Republic of Croatia. Informatol, 53, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.53.1-2.2
  • Murillo, F. J., & Hernández-Castilla, R. (2020). Does parental involvement matter in children's performance? A Latin American primary school study. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2019.10.002
  • Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 19–35.
  • Pearson. (2018). Beyond Millennials: The Next Generation of Learners. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/news/news-annoucements/2018/The-Next-Generation-of-Learners_final.pdf
  • Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2020). COVID-19 and the promotion of digital competences in education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4520–4528. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081020
  • Sánchez-Antolín, P., Andrés-Viloria, C., & Paredes-Labra, J. (2018). The role of the family in the development of digital competence. Digital Education Review, 34, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2018.34.44-58
  • Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007
  • Tejedor, F. J., García-Valcárcel, A., & Prada, S. (2009). A scale for the measurement of university teachers’ attitudes towards the integration of ICT. Comunicar, 17(33), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.3916/c33-2009-03-002
  • Vila-Couñago, E., Regueira, U., & Pernas-Morado, E. (2020). The Safety Area of Digital Competence: A Mixed Method Study in Galician Primary Education Students. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 15(4), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.3033218
  • Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van Den Brande, L. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Publication Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2791/11517