Assessing digital competence and its relationship with the socioeconomic level of Chilean university students

  1. Juan Silva-Quiroz
  2. Erla Mariela Morales-Morgado
Revista:
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

ISSN: 2365-9440

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 19

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1186/S41239-022-00346-6 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Digital competence (DC) is one of the key aspects in citizen development in the digital age. The DC is particularly important in forming university students and future teachers. This article presents the main results of a study to evaluate DC and its relationship with the socioeconomic level of frst-year students of pedagogy in three Chilean public uni‑ versities, located in the north, center, and south of the country. A quantitative research methodology was used, with a sample of 817 students, the data were collected through the DIGCOMP-PED evaluation instrument, which evaluates DC development using the DIGCOMP framework. The results were analyzed at the general and socio‑ economic level on the variables of the educational establishment where they attended high school and the territorial area of the university they attended. The main results indicate that the level of DC achievement is intermediate, the areas with the highest levels of achievement were “network security” and “online communication and collabo‑ ration.” On the other hand, the lowest levels of achievement were reached in the areas “information and digital literacy,” “digital content creation,” and “problem solving.” The level of DC is higher among students of private establishments and those who attend universities located in the central area.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACARA. (2012). National assessment program e ICT literacy years 6 & 10 report 2011. Sidney: Australian curriculum. Assess- ment and Reporting Authority. http:// www. nap. edu. au/ verve/_ resou rces/ nap_ ictl_ 2011_ public_ report_ final. pdf.
  • Aguaded, I., & Cabero, J. (2013). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad. Alianza Editorial.
  • Araneda-Guirriman, C., Sallán, J. G., Pedraja-Rejas, L., & Rodríguez-Ponce, E. (2018). Percepciones sobre el perfl del estudiante universitario en el contexto de la educación superior de masas: Aproximaciones desde Chile. Interciencia, 43(12), 864–8700.
  • Barrientos-Oradini, N., & Araya-Castillo, L. (2018). Educación Superior en Chile: una visión sistémica. Aletheia. Revista de Desarrollo Humano, Educativo y Social Contemporáneo, 10(2), 80–109. https:// aleth eia. cinde. org. co/ index. php/ ALETH EIA/ artic le/ view/ 507/ 277
  • Brunner, J. J. (2012). La lucha por la educación de las elites: Campo y canales formativos. Revista UDP, 9(1), 119–143.
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., Barragán-Sánchez, R., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., & Martín-Párraga, L. (2021). Design and Validation of t- MOOC for the Development of the Digital Competence of Non-University Teachers. Technologies, 9(4), 84. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ techn ologi es904 0084
  • Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg, Office of the European Union,. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2760/ 38842
  • Casillas, S., Cabezas, M., Sanches-Ferreira, M., & Teixeira, F.L. (2018). Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire to Measure the Digital Competence of University Students (CODIEU). Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(3), 69–81.https:// doi. org/ 10. 14201/ eks20 18193 6981. Catalán, X., & Santelices, M. (2014). Rendimiento académico de estudiantes de distinto nivel socioeconómico en univer- sidades: El caso de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Calidad En La Educación, 40, 21–52.
  • Claro, M., Preiss, D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., et al. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ict skills in chile: test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59, 1042–1053. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. compe du. 2012. 04. 004.
  • Claro, M., Cabello, T., San Martin, E., & Nussbaum, M. (2015). Comparing marginal effects of Chilean students’ economic, social and cultural status on digital versus reading and mathematics performance. Computers & Education, 82, 1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. compe du. 2014. 10. 018
  • Domingo-Coscolla, M., Bosco, A., Carrasco-Segovia, S., & Sánchez-Valero, J. A. (2020). Fomentando la competencia digital docente en la universidad: Percepción de estudiantes y docentes. Revista De Investigación Educativa, 38(1), 167–782. https:// doi. org/ 10. 6018/ rie. 340551
  • Durán, M., Gutiérrez, I. & Prendes, M. (2016), “Análisis conceptual de modelos de competencia digital del profesorado universitario”, RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 15(1), 97–114, http:// hdl. handle. net/ 10662/ 5790
  • Engen, B. K. (2019). Understanding social and cultural aspects of teachers’ digital competencies. Comunicar, 27(61), 9–19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3916/ C61-
  • European Commission (Ed.) (2018), Proposal for a council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning, Brus- sels, The council of the European union. https:// bit. ly/ 2YsyG Nz
  • Fernández-Mellizo, M., & Manzano, D. (2018). Anàlisi de les diferències en la competència digital dels alumnes espanyols. Papers: revista de Sociología, 103(2), 175–198. https:// raco. cat/ index. php/ Papers/ artic le/ view/ 336759
  • Ferrari, A. (2012), Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Framework Sevilla: JRC‐IPTS. http:// ftp. jrc. es/ EURdoc/ JRC68 116. pdf.
  • Fraser, J., Atkins, L. & Hall, R. (2013) DigiLit Leicester: Supporting teachers, promoting digital literacy, transforming learning, Leicester, Leicester City Council http:// www. josie fraser.
  • Fuller, M. T. (2020). ISTE standards for students, digital learners, and online Learning. In Handbook of Research on Digital Learning (pp. 284–290). IGI Global.
  • Gabarda-Méndez, V., Rodríguez Martín, A., & Moreno Rodríguez, M. D. (2017). La competencia digital en estudiantes de magisterio. Análisis competencial y percepción personal del futuro maestro. Educatio Siglo XXI, 35(2 Julio), 253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 6018/j/ 298601
  • Gallego-Arrufat, M.â J., Torres-Hernández, N., & Pessoa, T. (2019). Competence of future teachers in the digital security area. Comunicar, 27(61), 57–67.
  • Gómez-Pablos, V., García-Valcárcel, A., Casillas-Martín, S., & Cabezas-González, M. (2020). Evaluación de competencias informacionales en escolares y estudio de algunas variables influyentes. Revista Complutense de Educación, 4(31), 517–528. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5209/ rced. 65835
  • González, J., Esteve, F. M., Larraz, V., Espuny, C., & Gisbert, M. (2018). INCOTIC 20: una nueva herramienta para la autoeval- uación de la competencia digital del alumnado universitario. Profesorado, 22(4), 133–152. https:// doi. org/ 10. 30827/ profe sorado. v22i4. 8401
  • González-Calatayud, V., Román-García, M., & Prendes-Espinosa, M. P. (2018). Formación en competencias digitales para estudiantes universitarios basada en el modelo DIGCOMP. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 65, 1–15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 21556/ edutec. 2018. 65. 1119
  • Gros, B. (2015). The fall of the walls of knowledge in the digital society and the emerging pedagogies. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 58–68. https:// doi. org/ 10. 14201/ eks20 15161 5868
  • Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020). Quantitative-comparative research on digital competence in students, graduates and professors of faculty education: An analysis with ANOVA. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4157–4174. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-
  • Gutiérrez, I., Román, M., & Sánchez, M. M. (2018). Estrategias para la comunicación y el trabajo colaborativo en red de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Comunicar, 54, 91–100
  • Gutiérrez, I., & Serrano, J. L. (2016). Evaluation and development of digital competence in future primary school teachers at the University of Murcia. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 51–56. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7821/ naer. 2016.1. 152
  • Guzmán-Simón, F., García-Jiménez, E., & López-Cobo, I. (2017). Undergraduate students’ perspectives on digital competence and academic literacy in a Spanish University. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 196–204. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2017. 04. 040
  • Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT selfâ efficacy and computer and informa- tion literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107–119. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. compe du. 2017. 11. 011
  • He, T., & Zhu, C. (2017). Digital informal learning among Chinese university students: The effects of digital competence and personal factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/
  • Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ Perspectives on Technology and Children’s Learning in the Home: Social Class and the Role of the Habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.
  • Jara, I., Claro, M., Hinostroza, J. E., San Martín, E., Rodríguez, P., Cabello, T., & Labbé, C. (2015). Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed methods analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 387–398. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. compe du. 2015. 07. 016
  • Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Computers & Education, 49(2), 460–480.
  • Liesa-Orús, M., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Lloret-Gazo, J. (2016). Identifcación de las fortalezas y debilidades de la competencia digital en el uso de aplicaciones de internet del alumno de primer curso del Grado de Magisterio. Revista Complutense De Educación, 27(2), 845–862
  • Gazo, J. (2016). Identificación de las fortalezas y debilidades de la competencia digital en el uso de aplicaciones de internet del alumno de primer curso del Grado de Magisterio. Revista Complutense De Educación, 27(2), 845–862. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5209/ rev_ RCED. 2016. v27. n2. 48409
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
  • López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital compe‑ tence in three areas of the DIGCOMP 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 69–88
  • McGahee, T., & Ball, J. (2009). How to read and really use an item analysis. Nurse Educator, 34, 166–171. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ NNE. 0b013 e3181 aaba94
  • Mirete, A.; García, F. & Hernández, F. (2015), Cuestionario para el estudio de la actitud, el conocimiento y el uso de TIC (ACUTIC) en Educación Superior: Estudio de fiabilidad y validez, Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, vol. 83, pp.75–89, Recuperado de https:// www. redal yc. org/ artic ulo. oa? id= 27443 659006
  • Moya-Martínez, M. del V., Hernández Bravo, J. R., Hernández Bravo, J. A. & Cózar Gutiérrez, R. (2011). Análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje y las TIC en la formación personal del alumnado universitario a través del cuestionario REATIC. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 29(1), 137–156
  • Nami, F., & Vaezi, S. (2018). How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a univer-sity of technology respond. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 510–529.
  • Napal-Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. (2018). Development of Digital Competence in Secondary Education Teachers’ Training. Educ. Sci., 8, 3
  • Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Dimensions of digital literacy based on fve models of develop‑ ment/Dimensiones de la alfabetización digital a partir de cinco modelos de desarrollo. Cultura y Educación, 31(2), 232–266
  • Prendes-Espinosa, M., & Román-García, M. (2017). Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje. Una visión actual de cómo aprender con tecnologías. Octaedro
  • Punter, R., Meelissen, M., & Glas, C. (2017). Diferencias de género en la alfabetización informática e informacional: una exploración del desempeño de niñas y niños en ICILS 2013. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 762–780. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14749 04116 672468
  • Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DIGCOMPEdu. In Y. Punie (Ed.), EUR 28775 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2760/ 159770
  • Rodríguez-Garcés, C. R., & Muñoz-Soto, J. A. (2018). Habilidades TIC para el aprendizaje en estudiantes chilenos: una insuficiente y segmentadainstalación de competencias en la escuela. Paradigma, 39(1), 208–228.
  • Román, M., & Murrillo, J. (2013). Estimación del efecto escolar para la competencia digital. Aporte del liceo en el desarrollo de las habilidades TIC en estudiantes de secundaria en Chile [Investigation into the effect of school on digital competency: The contribution of the lyceum to the development of ICT in Chilean high school students]. In CEPPE, Desarrollo de habilidades digitales para el siglo XXI en Chile: ¿Qué dice el SIMCE TIC? [Developing digital skills for the twenty-first century in Chile: What does ICT SIMCE say?] (pp. 141–176). Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones.
  • Roque Hernández, R. V., & Juárez Ibarra, C. M. (2018). Concientización y capacitación para incrementar la seguridad informática en estudiantes universitarios. PAAKAT, 8, 14.
  • Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2015). Combining selfassessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: Empirical results and recommendations for practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 740–754. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02602 938. 2014. 950554
  • Sánchez-Caballé, A., Gisbert-Cervera, M., & Esteve-Mon, F. (2020). The digital competence of university students: a systematic literature review, Aloma: Revista de Psicologia. Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 38, 1. https:// doi. org/ 10. 51698/ aloma. 2020. 38.1. 63-74
  • Segrera-Arellana, J. R., Paez-Logreira, H. D., & Polo-Tovar, A. A. (2020). Competencias digitales de los futuros profesionales en tiempos de pandemia. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(11), 222–232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5281/ zenodo. 42783
  • Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in Digital Networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers and Education, 109, 11–37. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. compe du. 2017. 01. 014.
  • Silva, J., Usart, M., & Lázaro-Cantabrana, J.L. (2019). Teacher’s digital competence among final year Pedagogy students in Chile and Uruguay. Comunicar, 27(61), 33–43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3916/ C61-2019-
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Meneses, E. L., & García-Garzón, E. (2017). Differences in basic digital competences between male and female university students of Social Sciences in Spain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s41239-017-0065-
  • Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out of school experiences. Computers & Education, 54(4), 941–950.
  • Villa-Sánchez, A., & Poblete-Ruiz, M. (2011). Evaluación de competencias genéricas: Principios, oportunidades y limitaciones. Bordón, 63(1), 147–170.
  • Zhong, Z. J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56(3), 736–746.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet