Selfis y clips de vídeo de adolescentespapel del género, territorio y nivel sociocultural

  1. Uxía Regueira 1
  2. Ángela González-Villa 1
  3. Esther Martínez-Piñeiro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña (España)
Journal:
Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Juventud,identidad de género y poder en las plataformas digitales

Issue: 75

Pages: 61-73

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C75-2023-05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

Abstract

Social networks integrate adolescent daily life by configuring modes of socialisation, negotiation and self-representation through different practices that operate as subjectivation resources and condition the gender experience. The objective of this study is to explore the production of selfies and videos among adolescents from Puebla (Mexico) and Galicia (Spain) from a gender, territorial, and sociocultural perspective. A survey study was carried out using an online questionnaire designed ad hoc and applied to 6,654 adolescents (14-17 years), with different gender identities, from public secondary schools in Puebla and Galicia. The results show that the selfie is a more widespread practice among adolescents than video, with revealing differences in its production. Similarities are evident in the level of preparation and the motivations that lead to these practices. Gender differences are found in their production in terms of intentions, materialities, and body expression. The family’s sociocultural level and the territory are visualised as realities that affect the production of these practices. The conclusions point to a transition of knowledge and meanings between the selfie and video and the relevance of analysing gender experience on social networks in light of the forms of power they exercise there.

€ View funding

Funding information

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Amigot, P., & Pujal, M. (2009). Una lectura del género como dispositivo de poder. Sociológica, 24(79), 115-151. https://bit.ly/3FfLgGT
  • Ayerbe, N., & Cuenca, J. (2019). Explorando la performatividad de la autoimagen desde el arte de acción. Papeles del CEIC, 2, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.20260
  • Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered. Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press. https://bit.ly/3PpaXJG
  • Boczkowski, P., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). El sentido práctico. Taurus. https://bit.ly/3YozO4E
  • Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer-mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Bucknell-Bossen, C.B., & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young consumers, 21, 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186
  • Camacho-Miñano, M.J., Macisaac, S., & Rich, E. (2019). Postfeministm biopedagogies of Instagram: young women learning about bodies, health and fitness. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1613975
  • Cohen, L., Mannion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://bit.ly/3uNtMgr
  • Connell, R., & Pearse, R. (2018). Género desde una perspectiva global. Universitat de València. https://bit.ly/3j0g6vJ
  • De-Lauretis, T. (1989). Technologies of gender. Essays on theory, film and fiction. Macmillan Press. https://bit.ly/3HAJOlf
  • Del-Moral-Pérez, M.E., Guzmán-Duque, A.P., & Bellver-Moreno, M.D.C. (2021). Interacción social de universitarios colombianos y españoles en medios sociales y perfiles predominantes. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 20(2), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.20.2.9
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Pre-textos.
  • Dhir, A., Pallesen, S., Torsheim, T., & Andreassen, C.S. (2016). Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours? Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 549-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.053
  • Duguay, S. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer visibility through selfies: Comparing platform mediators across Ruby Rose’s Instagram and Vine presence. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641975
  • Dussel, I. (2011). VII Foro Latinoamericano de Educación: Aprender y enseñar en la cultura digital. Santillana. https://bit.ly/3hjqazG
  • Echeburrua, E., & De-Corral, P. (2010). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías y a las redes sociales en jóvenes: Un nuevo reto. Revista Adicciones, 22(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.196
  • Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 27-36. https://bit.ly/3W6p1Kg
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Pantheon. https://bit.ly/3BvXVo4
  • Fumero, A., & Espiritusanto, O. (2012). Jóvenes e infotecnologías, entre nativos y digitales. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/3UR6TTW
  • Gewerc, A., Fraga, F., & Rodes, V. (2017). Niños y adolescentes frente a la competencia digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 31(89), 171-186. https://bit.ly/3Y15VXM
  • Gómez-Urrutia, V., & Jiménez-Figueroa, A. (2022). Identidad en la era digital: Construcción de perfiles en redes sociales en adolescentes chilenos/as. Convergencia, 29, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v29i0.17430
  • Jacquier, D. (2019). Desafíos virtuales: La tensión entre el riesgo y la socialización. Revista Sociedad, 39, 188-205. https://bit.ly/3FhBdB8
  • Jenzen, O. (2022). LGBTQ youth cultures and social media. In I. West (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of queer studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1363
  • Latour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social: Una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Manantial. https://bit.ly/3V244zg
  • Martínez-Valerio, L. (2013). Facebook y los jóvenes universitarios: Qué comunican según el género. Historia y Comunicación Social, 18, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.44313
  • Miño-Puigcercós, R., Vargas, P.R., & Alonso, C. (2019). Comunidades virtuales: Dinámicas emergentes de participación social y aprendizaje entre los jóvenes. the Knowledge Society, 20, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2019_20_a21
  • Oberst, U., Chamarro, A., & Renau, V. (2016). Gender stereotypes 2.0: Self-representations of adolescents on Facebook. [Estereotipos de género 2.0: Auto-representaciones de adolescentes en Facebook]. Comunicar, 48, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-08
  • Padilla, M.T. (2002). Técnicas e instrumentos para el diagnóstico y la evaluación educativa. CCS. https://bit.ly/3WlAtC5
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook. LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808099577
  • Rea, L., & Parker, A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. Jossey-Bass. https://bit.ly/3hjSzFP
  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
  • Rodríguez-Illera, J.L., Barberà-Gregori, E., & Molas-Castells, N. (2021). Reasons and mediators in the development and communication of personal digital stories. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4093-4109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10460-z
  • Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turns in contemporary theory. Routledge. https://bit.ly/3hdSfZ0
  • Son, V. (2017). ‘I will not hate myself because you cannot accept me’: Problematizing empowerment and gender-diverse selfies. Popular Communication, 15(2), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1269906
  • Srnicek, N. (2018). Capitalismo de plataformas. Caja Negra Editora. https://bit.ly/3uQgHTj
  • Suárez-Álvarez, R., & García-Jiménez, A. (2021). Análisis y comparativa España-Gran Bretaña por género, edad y nacionalidad. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1503
  • Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
  • Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. TRENDS in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19-25. https://bit.ly/3VB0gGl
  • Van-Dijck, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad. Una historia crítica de las redes sociales. Siglo veintiuno editores. https://bit.ly/3F6Z5Hu
  • Van-Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De-Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
  • Vera-Balanza, M.T., Martín, I.S.L., & Romo-Parra, C. (2020). Identidades digitales en WhatsApp: La representación del género entre la población universitaria. Anàlisi, (pp. 67-83). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3244
  • Walker, P., & Laughter, J. (2019). Shoaling rhizomes: A theoretical framework for understanding social media’s role in discourse and composition education. Computers and Composition, 53, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.05.005
  • Wargo, J.M. (2015). Every selfie tells a story …”: LGBTQ youth lifestreams and new media narratives as connective identity texts. New Media & Society, 19(4), 560-578.
Data source: Dialnet