Confluencias entre pensamiento crítico y redes sociales en el ámbito educativo. Mapeo de experiencias y detección de desafíos a través de una revisión sistemática

  1. Escribano-Muñoz, Carmen 1
  2. Gil-Fernández, Raquel 1
  3. Calderón-Garrido, Diego 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Serra Húnter Fellow. Universitat de Barcelona (España)
Revista:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 35

Número: 2

Páginas: 363-379

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.85615 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista complutense de educación

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Las redes sociales se han convertido en el canal de comunicación y en el medio habitual de información por excelencia. Con ello, se ha incrementado la preocupación sobre las consecuencias de su uso, y de qué manera pueden influir en a la hora de enfrentar problemas sociales y construir identidades. Por tanto, se plantean nuevos desafíos en el mundo educativo en los que el pensamiento crítico constituye una competencia transversal cada vez más necesaria. Partiendo de este contexto, el presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar cómo la literatura científica ha tratado el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en el ámbito educativo en las redes sociales durante el período 2012-2021 mediante una revisión sistemática de la misma. La búsqueda se ha centrado en la Core Collection de la Web of Science (WoS) y se ha acometido la revisión mediante un método mixto. Los principales resultados muestran que el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico debe estar vinculado al uso de las redes sociales, y se remarca la necesidad de educar el pensamiento crítico desde la perspectiva de la alfabetización crítica digital. Sin embargo, se detecta escasez de producción científica que orienten unas políticas educativas para abordarlas en las aulas, lo que implica el desafío de abrir nuevas vías de investigación en esta línea.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguilar-Forero, N.J. (2019). Ciberactivismo y educación para la ciudadanía mundial: Una investigación-acción participativa con dos experiencias educativas de Bogotá. Palabra Clave, 22(2), e22210. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.2.10
  • Al-Zou’bi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782
  • Almuqrin, A., Zhang, Z.J., Alzamil, A., Mutambik, I., & Alhabeeb, A. (2020). The explanatory power of social capital in determining knowledge sharing in higher education: A case from Saudi Arabia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 25(3), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.5
  • Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912
  • Camas, L., Valero, A., & Vendrell, M. (2018). “Hacking memes”: Democratic culture, social media and education. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 11(23), 120-129. http://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v12i23.2017
  • Castellví, J., Díez-Bedmar, M.C., & Santisteban, A. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ critical digital literacy skills and attitudes to address social problems. Social Sciences,9(8), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080134
  • Chang, W.H., Liu, Y.C., & Huang, T.H. (2017). Perceptions of learning effectiveness in M-learning: Scale development and student awareness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12192.
  • Chelysheva, I., & Mikhaleva, G. (2021). Programs and projects for fostering interethnic tolerance among youth: Foreign and russian experience. Медиаобразование,1. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2021.1.45
  • Chen, C.M., & Tsao, H.W. (2021). An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education, 164, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037
  • Demirbilek, M. (2015). Social media and peer feedback: What do students really think about using Wiki and Facebook as platforms for peer feedback? Active Learning in Higher Education,16(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589530
  • Duart-Montoliu, J.M., Roig-Vila, R., Mengual-Andrés, S. & Maseda-Durán, M.A. (2017). La calidad pedagógica de los MOOC a partir de la revisión sistemática de las publicaciones JCR y Scopus (2013-2015). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 75(266), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-02
  • Ennis, R.H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. En M. Davies y R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 31-49). Palgrave Handbooks.
  • Eslamdoost, S., King, K.A., & Tajeddin, Z. (2019). Professional Identity Conflict and (Re)Construction among English Teachers in Iran. Journal of Language Identity and Education, 19(5), 327-341. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15348458.2019.1676157
  • Fidan, M., & Debbağ, M. (2018). The usage of video blog (vlog) in the “school experience” course: The opinions of the pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Future, 13, 161-177.
  • Figuera Avellán, S. (2022). Usos de las redes sociales: cibercultura y pensamiento crítico. Atenas, 3(59), 49–64.
  • Fonseca Morillo, F. (2020). Prólogo: La Europa que protege, de la teoría a la práctica gracias al pensamiento crítico y la alfabetización digital. Revista De Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(26), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v13i26.2593
  • Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2016). Creating micro-videos to demonstrate technology learning and digital literacy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.13(4), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2016-0030
  • Galan, N., & Khodabandehloo, A. (2016). Learning with LinkedIn: Students’ perceptions of incorporating subject-related blogging in an international marketing course. InteractiveTechnology and Smart Education. 13(2), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2015-0033
  • García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
  • Gil-Fernández, R. & Calderón-Garrido, D. (2021). El uso de las redes sociales en educación: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica. Digital Education Review, 40, 82-109. https://raco.cat/index.php/DER/article/view/395132
  • Gil-Fernández, R., Calderón, D., & Martín Piñol, C. (2023). Exploring the effect of social media in Personal Learning Environments in the university settings: analysing experiences and detecting future challenges. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(71),1-24. AUTORES (2023) http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.526311
  • Gozálvez-Pérez, V., Valero-Moya, A., & González-Martín, M. (2021). El pensamiento crítico en las redes sociales: Una propuesta teórica para la educación cívica en entornos digitales. Estudios sobre educación, 42, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.42.002
  • Guirao-Goris, J.A., Olmedo Salas, A., & Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria, 1(1.6).
  • Hanell, F. (2017). Teacher trainees’ information sharing activities and identity positioning on Facebook. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 244-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0085
  • Harden, A. & Thomas, J. (2010). Mixed methods and systematic reviews: Examples and emerging issues. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.749–774). Sage.
  • Hill, J., Thomas, G., Diaz, A., & Simm, D. (2016). Borderland spaces for learning partnership: Opportunities, benefits, and challenges. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 375-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144728
  • Hussain, I., Cakir, O., & Candeger, Ü. (2018). Social Media as a Learning Technology for University Students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 281-296. http://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11219a
  • Johnston, N. (2020). Living in the world of fake news: High school students’ evaluation of information from social media sites. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(4), 430-450. http://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1821146
  • Kahneman, D. (2014). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. PRH Grupo Editorial
  • Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
  • Koh, E., Jonathan, C., & Tan, J.P.L. (2019). Exploring conditions for enhancing critical thinking in networked learning: Findings from a secondary school learning analytics environment. Education Sciences,9(4), 287.; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040287
  • Larizgoitia, A., Madariaga-López, I., & Ajamil, E. (2020). Prácticas artísticas prosumidoras para la creación de una mirada crítica en tiempos hipervisuales. Tercio Creciente, 11, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.17561/rtc.extra2.5730
  • Levintin, D. J. (2017). Weaponized lies: How to think critically in the post-truth era. Penguin.
  • López-García, D.; Mateo, T.; Cortés Ancos, E.; Fernández de Viana, I. (2016). A debate and decision-making tool for enhanced learning. IEEE transactions on Learning technologies, 9(3), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2556664
  • Maftei, A., Holman, A.C., & Merlici, I.A. (2021). Using fake news as means of cyber-bullying: The link with compulsive internet use and online moral disengagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107032
  • Maggio, L.A., Costello, J.A., Norton, C., Driessen, E.W. & Artino, A.R. (2020). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.12.088542
  • Meneses, L.F. (2021). Thinking critically through controversial issues on digital media: Dispositions and key criteria for content evaluation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100927
  • Moher, D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., & Altman D.G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  • Morejón-Llamas, N. (2020). Desinformación y alfabetización mediática desde las instituciones: Los decálogos contra las fake news. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 10(20), 111-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-20-2020-07-111-134
  • Muellenbach, J. M. (2019). Use of Diverse Online Resources amongst Politically Active University Students Fosters Civic Knowledge Integration. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,14(2), 131.
  • Oh, E.G., Huang, W.H.D., Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: Comparison between peer-and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6
  • Oria, B. (2020). EDMODO as telecollaborative learning tool in the English Language Classroom. Encuentro, 28, 49-70.
  • Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow, C.D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Pattanapichet, F., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Using space in social media to promote undergraduate students’critical thinking skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,16(4), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.94170
  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage.Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., & Pérez-Maceira, J.J. (2021). “Fake News” or Real Science? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646909
  • Rajagopalan, K. (2019). Cross-cultural competence and the new literacy: The indispensable need for critical thinking. Revista da Anpoll. 1(49), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i49.1306
  • Riser, D.K., Clarke, S.D., & Stallworth, A.N. (2020). Scientific memes: Using the language of social media to improve scientific literacy and communication in lifespan development. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1475725720929277
  • Romero, W., Morante, M.C., & López, B.C. (2022). Alfabetización mediática crítica para mejorar la competencia del alumnado. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, (70), 47-57.
  • Mesquita-Romero, W., Fernández-Morante, C., & Cebreiro-López, B. (2022). Critical media literacy to improve students’ competencies. [Alfabetización mediática crítica para mejorar la competencia del alumnado]. Comunicar, 70, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.3916/C70-2022-04
  • Saini, M. & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
  • Santisteban, A., Díez-Bedmar, M.C., & Castellví, J. (2020). Critical digital literacy of future teachers in the Twitter Age. Culture and Education, 32(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1741875
  • Serrano-Estrada, L., Martin, T.J., & Marti, P. (2021). Understanding city dynamics: using geolocated social media in a problem-based activity as an investigative tool to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1(22). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2004390
  • Shapovalova, E. (2020). Improving media education as a way to combat fake news. Медиаобразование, 60(4), 730-735. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2020.4.730
  • Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 9-17. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.002
  • Sohoni,T. (2019). Harnessing the Power of Social Media in the Classroom: Challenging Students to Create Content to Share on Social Media Sites to Improve Learning Outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 30(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2018.1538420
  • Stevenson, M., Hedberg, J., Highfield, K., & Diao, M. (2015). Visualizing Solutions: Apps as Cognitive Stepping-Stones in the Learning Process. Electronic Journal of E-Learning,13(5), 366-379.
  • Suárez-López, D., Colón López, C., Cohen Jiménez, J., & Colpas, E. (2016). Apropiación de la Redes sociales para la aplicación del método Socrático en el pensamiento crítico. Zona Próxima, 25, 118-128. https://doi.org//10.14482/zp.22.5832
  • *Suárez, M.M., & González Argüello, M.V. (2020). Becoming a good BookTuber. RELC Journal, 51(1), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906905
  • Šuminas, A., & Jastramskis, D. (2020). The importance of media literacy education: How Lithuanian students evaluate online news content credibility. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(2), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.2(26).5
  • Tawfik, G.M., Dila, K.A.S., Mohamed, M.Y.F. (2019).A step-by-step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropic Medicine and Health,47(46). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6
  • Teba, E. (2021). Educando al homo digitalis: El papel de la educación y del digcomedu para paliar los efectos de los algoritmos, las fakenews, la polarización y falta de pensamiento crítico. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación,154, 71-92. http://doi.org/10.15178/va.2021.154.e1378
  • Thormann, J., Gable, S., Fidalgo, P.S., & Blakeslee, G. (2013). Interaction, critical thinking, and social network analysis (SNA) in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,14(3), 294-318. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1306
  • Triviño, L., & Vaquero, C. (2020). Artistic and citizenship education in the initial training of primary school teachers: A case study for developing critical, creative and social thinking through malamente ‘Malamente’. Revista Complutense De Educación, 31(3), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.63488
  • Valdiviezo, J.L.C., Viteri, J.C.R., & Carrera, G.M.D. (2016). Twitter en la Educación. Revista Publicando, 3(9), 238-249. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/359
  • Vurdien, R., & Puranen, P. (2016). A Spanish-Finnish Telecollaboration to Develop Intercultural Competence and Learner Autonomy. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching,6(3), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2016070103
  • Walton, G., & Hepworth, M. (2013). Using assignment data to analyse a blended information literacy intervention: A quantitative approach. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(1), 53-63. http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434999
  • Weiss, A.P., Alwan, A., Garcia, E.P., & Kirakosian, A.T. (2021). Toward a Comprehensive Model of Fake News: A New Approach to Examine the Creation and Sharing of False Information. Societies,11(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030082
  • Zhdanko, A. (2019). Identification of cognitive manipulations that have the greatest impact on students in the internet. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(1), 35-42. http://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901035Z
  • Zulkifli, N.D.; Abd Halim, N.; Yahaya & Van Der Meijden, H. (2020). Patterns of Critical Thinking Processing in Online Reciprocal Peer Tutoring Through Facebook Discussion. IEEE Access, 8, 24269-24283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968960
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet