Transforming the teaching and learning culture in higher education from a DIY perspective

  1. Raquel Miño-Puigcercós 1
  2. María Domingo-Coscollola 2
  3. Juana M. Sancho-Gil 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España


  2. 2 Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    Barcelona, España


Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X 2174-5374

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Pages: 139-160

Type: Article

More publications in: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación


Cited by

  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 15 (25-02-2024)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Impact Factor: 2.261
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 2.159
  • Article influence score: 0.103
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 63/263 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2019
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.631
  • Best Quartile: Q2
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 371/1616

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Impact: 2.140
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 6/241


  • Social Sciences: A

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2019
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 2.7
  • Area: Education Percentile: 80

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 1.14
  • Best Quartile: Q2
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 209/723


This article focuses in part of the results of the implementation of the European project DIYLab in five bachelor’s degrees at the University of Barcelona (Primary Education, Early Childhood Education, Social Education, Education and Fine Art). The project was carried out in six elementary and secondary schools and two Universities of Spain, Finland and the Czech Republic. The main focus was to incorporate learning modalities related to the Do it Yourself (DIY) culture, fostering creativity, collaboration, self-regulation, authorship and a critical use of digital technology. Following a methodology based on the principles of participatory action-research (PAR), we first organized discussion groups with teachers, students and, in the case of elementary and secondary schools, families. Then, we defined the implementation, based on the characteristics of each institution and the formative actions organized with the teachers. During the teacher’s professional development, the participants proposed that students create audio-visual productions collaboratively about their learning and the processes that propitiated it. Simultaneously, we created the open digital platform DIYLabHub with the aim of sharing the productions created by students. During the implementation at the University of Barcelona, 471 students collaboratively created and shared 76 audio-visual objects in the Hub and the researchers carried out observations, recordings, field notes and discussion groups. In this article, we present the results of the analysis and the conclusions of how teaching and learning practices were transformed, how teachers’ and students’ attitudes and roles were reconfigured, and the possibilities of sustainability of the DIY culture in Higher Education.

Bibliographic References

  • Ala-Mutka, K. (2009). Review of Learning in ICT-enabled Networks and Communities. European Commission. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved from
  • Ashworth, H. (2016). Students’ acquisition of a threshold concept in childhood and youth studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 94-103. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.1003953
  • Association of American Colleges and Universities (2007). College learning for the new global century. A Report from the national Leadership Council for Liberal education & America’s Promise. Retrieved from
  • Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K., … Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments. life-long, life-wide, life-deep. The LIFE Center for Multicultural Education. Retrieved from
  • Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2013). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5-6), 269-284. doi: 10.1159/000345315
  • Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated. The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press Book.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond Technology: Children’s Learning in the Age of Digital Culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Carey, B. (2014). How we learn: the surprising truth about when, where, and why it happens. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK & Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Domingo-Coscollola, M., Arrazola-Carballo, J., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2016). Do It Yourself in education: Leadership for learning across physical and virtual borders. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 4(1), 5-29. doi: 10.17583/ijelm.2016.1842
  • Domingo-Coscollola, M., Sánchez-Valero, J. A., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2014). Researching on and with Young People: Collaborating and Educating. Comunicar, 42, 157-164. doi: 10.3916/C42-2014-15
  • Dussel, I., & Gutiérrez, D. (Comps.). (2006). Educar la mirada. Políticas y pedagogías de la imagen. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Manantial/FLACSO.
  • Ellsworth, J. B. (2000). Surviving change: A survey of educational change models. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
  • Erstad, O., Gile, O., Sefton-Green, J., & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Learning identities, education and community: young live in the cosmopolitan city. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, A., Schrøder, K. C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Jóhannsdóttir, T. (Eds.). (2016). Learning across contexts in the knowledge society. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Fullan. M. (2002). The Change Leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-21.
  • Furlong, J., & Oancea, A. (Eds.). (2008). Assessing quality in applied and practice-based research in education: continuing the debate. London, UK: Routledge.
  • García-Galera, C., & Valdivia, A. (2014). Media Prosumers. Participatory Culture of Audiences and Media Responsability. Comunicar, 43(22), 10-13. doi: 10.3916/C43-2014-a2
  • García-Valcárcel, A., & Tejedor-Tejedor, F. J. (2017). Student perception of the value of ICT’s in their learning strategies and their relation to performance. Educación XX1, 20(2), 137-159, doi:10.5944/educXX1.13447
  • Gutiérrez, A., & Tyner, K. (2013). Media Education, Media Literacy and digital Competence. Comunicar, 38(19), 31-39. doi: 10.3916/C38-2011-02-03
  • Hernández-Hernández, F. (Coord.). (2017). ¡Y luego dicen que la escuela pública no funciona! Investigar con los jóvenes sobre cómo transitan y aprenden dentro y fuera de los centros de Secundaria. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2015). Participatory Culture in a Networked Era. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kafai, Y., & Peppler, K. (2011). Youth Technology and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89-119. doi: 10.3102/0091732x10383211
  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY media. Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The Class: living and learning in the digital age. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (n.d.). Guidelines for Teaching. Teaching + Learning Lab. Retrieved from
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2010). Learning our lesson: Review Of Quality Teaching in Higher Education. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from
  • Palaigeorgiou, G., & Grammatikopoulou, A. (2016). Benefits, barriers and prerequisites for Web 2.0 learning activities in the classroom: The view of Greek pioneer teachers. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(1), 2-18. doi: 10.1108/ITSE-09-2015-0028
  • Pérez-Escoda, A., Castro-Zubizarreta, A., & Fandos, M. (2016). Digital Skills in the Z Generation: Key Questions for a Curricular Introduction in Primary School. Comunicar, 49(24), 71-79. doi: 10.3916/C49-2016-07
  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: Sage.
  • Richard, G. T., & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Blind Spots in Youth DIY Programming: Examining Diversity in Creators, Content, and Comments within the Scratch Online Community. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1473-1485). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Sancho-Gil, J. M., Sánchez-Valero, J. A., & Domingo-Coscollola, M. (2017). Research-based insights on initial teacher education in Spain. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 310-325. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1320388
  • Scott, P. (2012). Re-thinking knowledge: bases for enquiry-led teaching and learning processes. In J. M. Correa & E. Aberasturi (coords.). (Re)pensar la innovación en la universidad (pp. 42-63). Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
  • Senge, P. (1990). La quinta disciplina. El arte y la práctica de la organización abierta al aprendizaje. Barcelona: Granica.
  • Sharpe, R., Beethan, H., & De Freitas, S. (2010). Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping Their Own Experiences. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers into Collaborators. New York, NY: Penguin.
  • Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Paper presented at the University of Georgia IT Forum. Retrieved from
  • Thomas, T., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
  • Twenge, J. (2017). IGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy--and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood--and What That Means for the Rest of Us. New York, NY: ATRIA Books.
  • Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wals, A. E., & Jickling, B. (2002). «Sustainability» in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221-232. doi: 10.1108/14676370210434688