Exploring student and family concerns and confidence in BigTech digital platforms in public schools

  1. Pablo Rivera-Vargas
  2. Diego Calderón-Garrido
  3. Judith Jacovkis
  4. Lluís Parcerisa
Journal:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 13

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1007/S44322-023-00003-4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Abstract

The use of commercial digital platforms in public schools like Google and Microsoft, which was exacerbated during the pandemic, requires analysis to encourage a safer and more appropriate educational use. The research objective behind this article was to analyse the concerns of school students in obligatory primary and secondary education in public schools within the Autonomous Region of Catalonia (Spain) together with the opinions of their families regarding the use of digital platforms offered by large technology companies (BigTech) in schools. This is a mixed design study, consisting of eight discussion groups with pupils (n = 56) and a questionnaire issued to 2,330 family members. The results show that both students and families are concerned about the lack of knowledge surrounding the data they generate when using these digital platforms, and their effect on democratic school governance and the reproduction of gender stereotypes. In conclusion, the study suggests it is necessary to create greater critical awareness among children, adolescents and families at all socio-economic levels, particularly in those who are most vulnerable.

Bibliographic References

  • Amos, S. K. (2019). Digitization, Disruption, and the Society of Singularities: The Transformative Power of the Global Education Industry. In M. Parreira do Amaral, G. Steiner-Khamsi & C. Thompson (Eds.), Researching the Global Education Industry. Commodification, the Market and Business Involvement (225–249). Springer. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3-030-04236-3_ 11
  • Barassi, V. (2018). The child as datafied citizen: Critical questions on data justice in family life. In G. Mascheroni, C. Ponte, & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital parenting: The challenges for families in the digital age. Nordicom
  • Calderon-Garrido, D., Parcerisa, L., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Moreno-Gonzalez, A. (2023). Opiniones de las familias sobre corporaciones tecnologicas, plataformas digitales educativas y derechos de la infancia: validacion psicometrica de un instrumento. Revista Aloma., 41(1), 141–148. https:// doi. org/ 10. 51698/ aloma. 2023. 41.1. 141-148
  • Castaneda, L., & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on edu-cational technology. [Encajando nuevas herramientas teoricas y metodologicas para inno-var en la investigacion critica en tecnologia educativa]. NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1–14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7821/ naer. 2021.1. 703
  • Cobo-Romani C, Rivera-Vargas P. (2022). Turn off your camera and turn on your privacy: A case study about Zoom and digital education in South American countries. In L. Pangrazio & J. Sefton-green. Learning to Live with Datafication Educational Case Studies and Initiatives from Across the World. (35–60). Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97810 03136 842-3
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97813 15456 539
  • Denzin, N., & Giardina, M. (2016). Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens. Routledge.
  • Diez-Gutierrez, E. J. (2021). Gobernanza hibrida digital y Capitalismo EdTech: la crisis del COVID-19 como amenaza. Foro de Educación, 19(1), 105–133. https:// doi. org/ 10. 14516/ fde. 860
  • Dussel, I. (2021). De la “clase en pantuflas” a la “clase con barbijo”. Notas sobre las escuelas en pandemia. Anales De La Educación Común, 2(1–2), 127–138. https:// bit. ly/ 3BXCv jk
  • Englander, E. (2021). Cyberbullying and Sexual Harassment: Bullying and Harassment in a Digital World. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 14(2), 35–43. https:// bit. ly/ 3LPQH zp
  • Garcia-Martin, J., & Garcia-Sanchez, J.-N. (2022). The Digital Divide of Know-How and Use of Digital Technologies in Higher Education: The Case of a College in Latin America in the COVID-19 Era. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3358. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1906 3358
  • Garcia-Martin, J., Rico, R., & Garcia-Martin, S. (2023). The Perceived Self-Efficacy of Teachers in the Use of Digital Tools during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study between Spain and the United States. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 213. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ bs130 30213
  • Gimenez-Gualdo, A., Arnaiz-Sanchez, P., Cerezo-Ramirez, F., & Prodocimo, E. (2018). Teachers’ and students’ perception about cyberbullying. Intervention and coping strategies in primary and secondary education. Comunicar, 26(56), 29–38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3916/ C56-2018-03
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review. https:// er. educa use. edu/ artic les/ 2020/3/ the-diffe rence-betwe en-emerg encyremote-teach ing-and-online-learn ing
  • Iniguez, L., & Antaki, C. (1994). Analisis del discurso en psicologia social. [Discourse analysis in social psychology]. Boletín De Psicología, 44, 57–75. https:// bit. ly/ 2QvJv Ke
  • Jacovkis, J., Rivera-Vargas, P., Parcerisa, L., & y Calderon, D. (2022). Resistir, alinear o adherir. Los centros educativos y las familias ante las BigTech y sus plataformas educativas digitales. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 82, 104–118. https:// doi. org/ 10. 21556/ edutec. 2022. 82. 2615
  • Kerssens, N., & Van Dijck, J. (2022). Governed by edtech? Valuing pedagogical autonomy in a platform society. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 284–303. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17763/ 1943-5045-92.2. 284
  • Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‘learnification’and ‘datafication’across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17439 884. 2019. 16232 51
  • Landri, P. (2018). Digital governance of education: Technology, standards and Europeanization of education. Bloomsbury Publishing
  • Lewis, S., Holloway, J., & Lingard, B. (2022). Emergent developments in the datafication and digitalization of education. In F. Rizvi, B. Lingard, & R. Rinne (Eds.), Reimagining globalization and education. Routledge.
  • Morozov, E. (2015). La locura del solucionismo tecnologico. Katz Editores y Capital Intelectual
  • Moser, C., Chen, T. and Schoenebeck, S.Y. (2017) Parents’ and children’s preferences about parents sharing about children on social media. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5221–5225. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 30254 53. 30255 87
  • Mullen, C., & Hamilton, N. F. (2016). Adolescents’ response to parental Facebook friend requests: The comparative influence of privacy management, parent–child relational quality, attitude and peer influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 165–172. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2016. 02. 026
  • Osorio-Saez, E., Eryilmaz, N., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Lau, Y., Barahona, E., Bhatti, A., Caesar Ofoe, G., Castro Ordonez, L., Cortez Ochoa, A., Espinoza Pizarro, R., Fonseca Aguilar, E., Isac, M., Dhanapala, K., Kumar Kameshwara, K., Martinez Contreras, Y., Mekonnen, G., Mejia, J., Miranda, C., Moh’d, S., … Zionts, A. (2021). Survey data on the impact of COVID- 19 on parental engagement across 23 countries. Data in Brief, 35, 106813. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17632/ kvvdg vs8zs.2
  • Parcerisa, L., Jacovkis, J., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Herrera-Urizar, G. (2023). Corporaciones tecnologicas, plataformas digitales y privacidad: Comparando los discursos sobre la entrada de las BigTech en la educacion publica. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, 42, 221–239. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5944/ reec. 42. 2023. 34417
  • Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2023). Spaces of Negotiation: Analyzing Platform Power in the News Industry. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1391–1409. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 21670 811. 2022. 21030 11
  • Prendes-Espinosa, M., Garcia-Tudela, P., & Solano-Fernandez, I. (2020). Gender equality and ICT in the context of formal education: A systematic review. [Igualdad de genero y TIC en contextos educativos formales: Una revision sistematica]. Comunicar, 28(63), 9–20. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3916/ C63-2020-01
  • Reed, E., Wong, A., & Raj, A. (2020). Cyber sexual harassment: A summary of current measures and implications for future research. Violence against Women, 26(12–13), 1727–1740. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10778 01219 880959
  • Sancho-Gil, J. M., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Mino-Puigcercos, R. (2020). Moving beyond the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 61–75. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17439 884. 2019. 16668 73
  • Saura, G., Diez-Gutierrez, E., & y Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Innovacion Tecno-Educativa “Google”. Plataformas Digitales, Datos y Formacion Docente. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 111–124. https:// doi. org/ 10. 15366/ reice 2021. 19.4. 007
  • Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020). What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1–6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17439 884. 2020. 16949 45
  • Stewart, D. W. (2018). Focus groups. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (pp. 687–692). Sage
  • Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Digital by default: Children’s capacity to understand and manage online data and privacy. Media and Communication, 8(4), 197–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17645/ mac. v8i4. 3407
  • Suarez-Guerrero, C., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Raffaghelli, J. (2023) EdTech myths: towards a critical digital educational agenda.
  • Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14759 39X. 2023. 22403 32
  • Teras, M., Suoranta, J., Teras, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863–878. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42438-020-00164-x
  • Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press
  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1998). Discourse analysis and identification of interpretive repertoires. In A. Gordo & J. Linaza (Eds.), Psychology, discourse and power: Qualitative methodologies, critical perspectives (pp. 63–78). Edvisor
  • Williamson, B. (2019). New Power Networks in Educational Technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 395–398. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17439 884. 2019. 16727 24
  • Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e) valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17508 487. 2020. 17375 56
  • Williamson, B., Gulson, K. N., Perrotta, C., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Amazon and the new global connective architectures of education governance. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 231–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17763/ 1943-5045-92.2. 231
  • Xie, W. J., & Kang, C. Y. (2015). See you, see me: Teenagers’ self-disclosure and regret of posting on social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 398–407. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2015. 05. 059
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books.
Data source: Dialnet